Paper · 2009 · HortScience

Influence of Grafted Watermelon Plant Density on Yield and Quality in Soil Infested with Melon Necrotic Spot Virus

María Victoria Huitrón-Ramírez; Marcia Ricárdez-Salinas; Francisco Camacho-Ferre

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One of the major problems of watermelon production is the decrease of fruit yield and quality caused by soil diseases. Soil disinfection with methyl bromide (MB) has been used to prevent fungus attacks; however, its use is being restricted because this substance damages the ozone layer. Searching for new MB alternatives, field experiments were carried out in open field in soils infested with Olpidium bornovanus and melon necrotic spot virus in Colima, Mexico, where watermelons had only been grown previously using soil fumigation with MB. Yield and quality of watermelon cultivar triploid Tri-X 313 grafted on two rootstocks of Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata (‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’) were evaluated during 2 consecutive years. Each experiment had five treatments, two of them with nongrafted plants at a density of 3472 plants/ha with and without MB fumigation. The remaining three treatments had grafted plants in nonfumigated soil with plant densities of 2778, 2083, and 1740 plants/ha. The use of watermelon grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstocks significantly increased the average fruit weight and the total yield of watermelon in soil without the need for MB. Grafting may be considered as an alternative MB fumigation. With the use of grafted watermelon plants, planting density may be reduced by 50%, obtaining higher yields than those obtained from nongrafted plants grown on fumigated soil except for ‘Tri-X 313’ grafted on ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ in 2006–2007. Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher firmness than those harvested from nongrafted plants without affecting the content of soluble solids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on RS841 increased average fruit weight in nonfumigated soil.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
‘RS841’e0
Treatment
grafted on ‘RS841’e0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of watermelon grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstocks significantly increased the average fruit weight and the total yield of watermelon in soil without the need for MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on Shintosa Camelforce increased average fruit weight in nonfumigated soil.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
‘Shintosa Camelforce’e0
Treatment
grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstockse0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of watermelon grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstocks significantly increased the average fruit weight and the total yield of watermelon in soil without the need for MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on RS841 increased total watermelon yield.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
‘RS841’e0
Treatment
grafted on ‘RS841’e0
Outcome
total yield of watermelone0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of watermelon grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstocks significantly increased the average fruit weight and the total yield of watermelon in soil without the need for MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on Shintosa Camelforce increased total watermelon yield.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
‘Shintosa Camelforce’e0
Treatment
grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstockse0
Outcome
total yield of watermelone0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of watermelon grafted on ‘RS841’ and ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ rootstocks significantly increased the average fruit weight and the total yield of watermelon in soil without the need for MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% reduction in density of grafted plants generally retained higher yield than fumigated nongrafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
planting density may be reduced by 50%e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
except for ‘Tri-X 313’ grafted on ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ in 2006–2007e0
Comparator
nongrafted plants grown on fumigated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the use of grafted watermelon plants, planting density may be reduced by 50%, obtaining higher yields than those obtained from nongrafted plants grown on fumigated soil except for ‘Tri-X 313’ grafted on ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ in 2006–2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from grafted plants had higher firmness than fruit from nongrafted plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nongrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher firmness than those harvested from nongrafted plants without affecting the content of soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not affect fruit soluble solids content.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
content of soluble solidse0
Direction
without affectinge0
Comparator
nongrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher firmness than those harvested from nongrafted plants without affecting the content of soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting may be considered an alternative to methyl bromide fumigation.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Grafting may be considered as an alternative MB fumigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting may be considered as an alternative MB fumigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

density · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.