Abstract
Three gummy stem blight (GSB) resistant watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) genotypes (IIHR-82, IIHR-617 and BIL-53), two resistant bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) genotypes (BG-95, BG-77-6-1) and three hybrid combinations based on watermelon genotypes (IIHR-617 × Arka Manik, IIHR-82 × Arka Manik and IIHR-82 × IIHR-617) were evaluated as rootstocks for yield, quality and GSB incidence in a sick plot during spring 2019, spring 2020 and spring 2021 at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore. The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks. Significant differences were observed among the grafted entries and checks in terms of disease incidence (PDI). Among agronomic traits, grafting significantly affected plant growth, earliness and yield in a desirable direction. The grafted scion onto the hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared to those onto IIHR-82 and BIL-53, whereas BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits. Quality traits showed an improvement in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), flesh colour, total carotenoids and lycopene content among the grafted entries as compared to non-grafted controls. Overall, the use of hybrid rootstocks i.e. IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik was found to be advantageous in managing GSB apart from imparting desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted entries differed significantly from checks in disease incidence (PDI).
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Treatment
- grafted entriese2
- Outcome
- disease incidence (PDI)e2
- Comparator
- checkse2
- Setting
- sick plote3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e2“Significant differences were observed among the grafted entries and checks in terms of disease incidence (PDI)”
e3“evaluated as rootstocks for yield, quality and GSB incidence in a sick plot during spring 2019”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting significantly affected plant growth, earliness and yield in a desirable direction.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Treatment
- graftinge4
- Outcome
- plant growth, earliness and yielde4
- Qualifier
- in a desirable directione4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e4“Among agronomic traits, grafting significantly affected plant growth, earliness and yield in a desirable direction”
Claim · model-written summary
The scion grafted onto hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared with scions on IIHR-82 and BIL-53.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Material
- hybrid rootstocks and BG-95e5
- Treatment
- grafted scione5
- Outcome
- oblong fruit shapee5
- Direction
- maintaine5
- Comparator
- IIHR-82 and BIL-53e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e5“The grafted scion onto the hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared to those onto IIHR-82 and BIL-53, whereas BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Scions grafted onto BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Material
- BG-77-6-1e5
- Outcome
- fruit shapee5
- Qualifier
- spherical fruitse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e5“The grafted scion onto the hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared to those onto IIHR-82 and BIL-53, whereas BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted entries improved total soluble solids (TSS) and flesh colour compared with non-grafted controls.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Treatment
- grafted entriese6
- Outcome
- total soluble solids (TSS), flesh coloure6
- Direction
- improvemente6
- Comparator
- non-grafted controlse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e6“Quality traits showed an improvement in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), flesh colour, total carotenoids and lycopene content among the grafted entries as compared to non-grafted controls”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted entries improved total carotenoids and lycopene content compared with non-grafted controls.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Treatment
- grafted entriese6
- Outcome
- total carotenoids and lycopene contente6
- Direction
- improvemente6
- Comparator
- non-grafted controlse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e6“Quality traits showed an improvement in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), flesh colour, total carotenoids and lycopene content among the grafted entries as compared to non-grafted controls”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the hybrid rootstocks IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik for managing GSB.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Material
- IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manike7
- Outcome
- managing GSBe7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e7“Overall, the use of hybrid rootstocks i.e. IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik was found to be advantageous in managing GSB apart from imparting desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid rootstocks impart desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits to grafted watermelon.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Treatment
- hybrid rootstockse7
- Outcome
- agronomic and fruit quality traitse7
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”
e7“Overall, the use of hybrid rootstocks i.e. IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik was found to be advantageous in managing GSB apart from imparting desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · physiology: pigments · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →grafting · quality: grain · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.