Paper · 2023 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Evaluation of rootstocks resistant to gummy stem blight and their effect on the fruit yield and quality traits of grafted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai)

Sourav Mahapatra; E. Sreeenivasa Rao; S. Shankara Hebbar; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three gummy stem blight (GSB) resistant watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) genotypes (IIHR-82, IIHR-617 and BIL-53), two resistant bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) genotypes (BG-95, BG-77-6-1) and three hybrid combinations based on watermelon genotypes (IIHR-617 × Arka Manik, IIHR-82 × Arka Manik and IIHR-82 × IIHR-617) were evaluated as rootstocks for yield, quality and GSB incidence in a sick plot during spring 2019, spring 2020 and spring 2021 at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore. The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks. Significant differences were observed among the grafted entries and checks in terms of disease incidence (PDI). Among agronomic traits, grafting significantly affected plant growth, earliness and yield in a desirable direction. The grafted scion onto the hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared to those onto IIHR-82 and BIL-53, whereas BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits. Quality traits showed an improvement in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), flesh colour, total carotenoids and lycopene content among the grafted entries as compared to non-grafted controls. Overall, the use of hybrid rootstocks i.e. IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik was found to be advantageous in managing GSB apart from imparting desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted entries differed significantly from checks in disease incidence (PDI).

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
grafted entriese2
Outcome
disease incidence (PDI)e2
Comparator
checkse2
Setting
sick plote3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant differences were observed among the grafted entries and checks in terms of disease incidence (PDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–728 · show in text ↑
e3

“evaluated as rootstocks for yield, quality and GSB incidence in a sick plot during spring 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting significantly affected plant growth, earliness and yield in a desirable direction.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
graftinge4
Outcome
plant growth, earliness and yielde4
Qualifier
in a desirable directione4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e4

“Among agronomic traits, grafting significantly affected plant growth, earliness and yield in a desirable direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The scion grafted onto hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared with scions on IIHR-82 and BIL-53.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
hybrid rootstocks and BG-95e5
Treatment
grafted scione5
Outcome
oblong fruit shapee5
Direction
maintaine5
Comparator
IIHR-82 and BIL-53e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e5

“The grafted scion onto the hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared to those onto IIHR-82 and BIL-53, whereas BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scions grafted onto BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
BG-77-6-1e5
Outcome
fruit shapee5
Qualifier
spherical fruitse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e5

“The grafted scion onto the hybrid rootstocks and BG-95 could maintain its oblong fruit shape compared to those onto IIHR-82 and BIL-53, whereas BG-77-6-1 produced spherical fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted entries improved total soluble solids (TSS) and flesh colour compared with non-grafted controls.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
grafted entriese6
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), flesh coloure6
Direction
improvemente6
Comparator
non-grafted controlse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e6

“Quality traits showed an improvement in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), flesh colour, total carotenoids and lycopene content among the grafted entries as compared to non-grafted controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted entries improved total carotenoids and lycopene content compared with non-grafted controls.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
grafted entriese6
Outcome
total carotenoids and lycopene contente6
Direction
improvemente6
Comparator
non-grafted controlse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e6

“Quality traits showed an improvement in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), flesh colour, total carotenoids and lycopene content among the grafted entries as compared to non-grafted controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1218 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the hybrid rootstocks IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik for managing GSB.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manike7
Outcome
managing GSBe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overall, the use of hybrid rootstocks i.e. IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik was found to be advantageous in managing GSB apart from imparting desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid rootstocks impart desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits to grafted watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
hybrid rootstockse7
Outcome
agronomic and fruit quality traitse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The commercial watermelon hybrid NS-295 was used as a scion for grafting onto these rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–616 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overall, the use of hybrid rootstocks i.e. IIHR-82 × IIHR-617 and IIHR-82 × Arka Manik was found to be advantageous in managing GSB apart from imparting desirable agronomic and fruit quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1417 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: pigments · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.