Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 50% reduction in density of grafted plants generally retained higher yield than fumigated nongrafted plants.

A claim from Influence of Grafted Watermelon Plant Density on Yield and Quality in Soil Infested with Melon Necrotic Spot Virus · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% reduction in density of grafted plants generally retained higher yield than fumigated nongrafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
planting density may be reduced by 50%e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
except for ‘Tri-X 313’ grafted on ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ in 2006–2007e0
Comparator
nongrafted plants grown on fumigated soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the use of grafted watermelon plants, planting density may be reduced by 50%, obtaining higher yields than those obtained from nongrafted plants grown on fumigated soil except for ‘Tri-X 313’ grafted on ‘Shintosa Camelforce’ in 2006–2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1508

Title

Influence of Grafted Watermelon Plant Density on Yield and Quality in Soil Infested with Melon Necrotic Spot Virus

María Victoria Huitrón-Ramírez; Marcia Ricárdez-Salinas; Francisco Camacho-Ferre HortScience 2009. doi:10.21273/hortsci.44.7.1838

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-f84ba32c19e20f3751d0f4b2effd2c8ca7fb030a34460242fd896bf9b622105a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.