Paper · 1990 · HortScience

WATERMELON YIELD AFFECTED BY PLANT POPULATION, PLANT NUMBER AND PLASTIC MULCH

D. C. Sanders; J. R. Schultheis; P.P. David; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We evaluated high plant population of watermelons when grown on black plastic with drip fertigation. We grew watermelons in 1.5m or 1.8 m centered rows, with one or two plants per hill, at spacing from 0.45 to 1.5 m in-row. Single plants constantly out yielded 2 plant hills and produced bigger melons. Large (over 9 kg) melon yields were not different at in-row spacing of 0.6 m and greater. However, the 5.4-9kg melons “pee wees” produced more yield as in-row spacing decreased. Thus total marketable melon yields increased as in-row spacing decreased to 0.45 m up to 21,000 melons and 135 T/ha. Plastic increased yield 2 to 4 times depending on the spacing. If small watermelons can be sold, single plants at 0.45m spacing provided the greatest return for the plastic-drip-fertigation system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single plant hills out yielded compared with two plant hills.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Single plantse0
Outcome
out yieldede0
Direction
out yieldede0
Comparator
2 plant hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single plants constantly out yielded 2 plant hills and produced bigger melons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single plant hills bigger melons compared with two plant hills.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Single plantse0
Outcome
bigger melonse0
Direction
biggere0
Comparator
2 plant hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single plants constantly out yielded 2 plant hills and produced bigger melons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of large melons did not differ among spacings of at least 0.6 m.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
in-row spacing of 0.6 m and greatere0
Outcome
Large (over 9 kg) melon yieldse0
Direction
not differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large (over 9 kg) melon yields were not different at in-row spacing of 0.6 m and greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of 5.4-9kg melons increased as in-row spacing decreased.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
in-row spacing decreasede0
Outcome
5.4-9kg melons “pee wees” produced more yielde0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 5.4-9kg melons “pee wees” produced more yield as in-row spacing decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total marketable melon yield increased at narrower spacing, reaching 135 T/ha at 0.45 m.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
in-row spacing decreased to 0.45 me0
Outcome
total marketable melon yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
135 T/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total marketable melon yields increased as in-row spacing decreased to 0.45 m up to 21,000 melons and 135 T/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable melon number reached 21,000 at 0.45 m spacing.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
melonse0
Value
21,000 melonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total marketable melon yields increased as in-row spacing decreased to 0.45 m up to 21,000 melons and 135 T/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased yield twofold to fourfold, depending on spacing.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Plastice0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2 to 4 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic increased yield 2 to 4 times depending on the spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single plants at 0.45m spacing gave the greatest return if small watermelons could be sold.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
single plants at 0.45m spacinge0
Outcome
greatest returne0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If small watermelons can be sold, single plants at 0.45m spacing provided the greatest return for the plastic-drip-fertigation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–795 · show in text ↑

density · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.