Paper · 2015 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Mitigating the Detrimental Impacts of Nitrogen Deficit and Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl Herbicide on Wheat using Silicon

H. S. Saudy; Manal Mubarak

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
47
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop plants treated with silicon (Si) can overcome the injury impacts of several stress conditions. However, scarce information is available about the significance of Si for helping the plants to overcome the injuries of low nitrogen (N) supply and herbicide pressure. A 2-year field experiment was carried out for evaluating four combinations of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and Si: fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si250ppm and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si500ppm (each either in sequence or in a tank mixture), in addition to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl alone, hand weeding, and weed check under two N levels (N100% and N50%). Silicon can mitigate the reduction in wheat yield but has no effect on weeds when applied with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. When adding N50%, sequential application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si250ppm along with hand weeding and other fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si treatments, except fenoxaprop-p-ethyl alone, were the most promising for improving grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl mitigated wheat yield reduction.

Treatment
Silicone0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
mitigate the reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon can mitigate the reduction in wheat yield but has no effect on weeds when applied with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl had no effect on weeds.

Treatment
Silicone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon can mitigate the reduction in wheat yield but has no effect on weeds when applied with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–707 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N50%, sequential fenoxaprop-p-ethyl plus Si250ppm, hand weeding, and other herbicide plus silicon treatments were promising for improving grain yield.

Treatment
sequential application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si250ppme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
When adding N50%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“When adding N50%, sequential application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si250ppm along with hand weeding and other fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + Si treatments, except fenoxaprop-p-ethyl alone, were the most promising for improving grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–935 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon atom · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.