Paper · 2001 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

MYCORRHIZAL INFLUENCE ON FRUIT YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT OF TOMATO GROWN UNDER SALT STRESS

Ghazi N. Al-Karaki; R. Hammad

17
claims
18
verbatim quotes
85
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) yields are known to decrease for plants grown in saline soils. This study was conducted to determine the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on fruit yield and mineral content of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive tomato cultivars grown with varied levels of salt. NaCl and CaCl2were added to soil in the irrigation water in equal molar ratios to give ECe values of 1.4 (nonstressed) and 4.9 dS m−1 (salt stressed). Plants were grown in a greenhouse using unsterilized, low phosphorus (P) (silty clay) soil-sand mix. Mycorrhizal root colonization occurred whether cultivars were salt stressed or nonstressed, but the extent of AMF root colonization was higher in AMF inoculated than uninoculated plants. The salt tolerant cultivar 'Pello' generally had higher AMF root colonization than the salt sensitive cultivar 'Marriha'. Shoot dry matter (DM) yield, fruit fresh yield, and AMF colonization were higher for plants grown under nonstressed than for plants grown under salt stressed conditions. Shoot DM and fruit fresh yields were higher in AMF inoculated than uninoculated plants grown with or without salt stress. Pello generally had higher fruit fresh yield per plant and fruit weight than Marriha, but these differences were only significant for fruit weight in unioculated plants grown under salt stressed conditions. The enhancement in fruit fresh yield due to AMF inoculation was 26 and 23% under nonstressed and 28 and 46% under salt stressed treatments for Pello and Marriha, respectively. For both cultivars, fruit contents of P, potassium (K), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) were higher in AMF inoculated compared with uninoculated plants grown under nonstressed and salt stressed conditions. Fruit Na concentrations were lower in AMF inoculated than uninoculated plants grown under salt stressed conditions. The enhancement in P, K, Zn, Cu, and Fe acquisition due to AMF inoculation was more pronounced in Marriha than in Pello cultivar under salt stressed conditions. The results of this study indicated that AMF inoculated plants had greater tolerance to salt stress than unioculated plants. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by grant from the Deanship of Scientific Research, Jordan University of Science and Technology. Valuable suggestions by Professor Ralph B. Clark are greatly appreciated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF root colonization occurred under both salt conditions.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Interactor
AMFe1
Outcome
Mycorrhizal root colonizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal root colonization occurred whether cultivars were salt stressed or nonstressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–675 · show in text ↑
e1

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased root colonization relative to uninoculated plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
AMF inoculatede0
Interactor
AMFe0
Outcome
AMF root colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“the extent of AMF root colonization was higher in AMF inoculated than uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–771 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pello generally had higher AMF root colonization than Marriha.

Taxon
cultivare0
Material
Pelloe0
Outcome
AMF root colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Marrihae0

Verbatim

e0

“The salt tolerant cultivar 'Pello' generally had higher AMF root colonization than the salt sensitive cultivar 'Marriha'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonstressed plants had higher shoot dry matter yield and fruit fresh yield than salt stressed plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
nonstressede0
Outcome
Shoot dry matter (DM) yield, fruit fresh yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
salt stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry matter (DM) yield, fruit fresh yield, and AMF colonization were higher for plants grown under nonstressed than for plants grown under salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonstressed plants had higher AMF colonization than salt stressed plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
nonstressede0
Interactor
AMFe0
Outcome
AMF colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
salt stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry matter (DM) yield, fruit fresh yield, and AMF colonization were higher for plants grown under nonstressed than for plants grown under salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased shoot dry matter and fruit fresh yields under both salt conditions.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
AMF inoculatede0
Interactor
AMFe0
Outcome
Shoot DM and fruit fresh yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot DM and fruit fresh yields were higher in AMF inoculated than uninoculated plants grown with or without salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pello generally had greater fruit fresh yield and fruit weight than Marriha, with significance restricted to fruit weight in uninoculated salt-stressed plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
Pelloe0
Outcome
fruit fresh yield per plant and fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
only significant for fruit weight in unioculated plants grown under salt stressed conditionse0
Comparator
Marrihae0

Verbatim

e0

“Pello generally had higher fruit fresh yield per plant and fruit weight than Marriha, but these differences were only significant for fruit weight in unioculated plants grown under salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enhanced Pello fruit fresh yield by 26% without salt stress.

Taxon
Pelloe0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Outcome
fruit fresh yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
26e0
Qualifier
nonstressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement in fruit fresh yield due to AMF inoculation was 26 and 23% under nonstressed and 28 and 46% under salt stressed treatments for Pello and Marriha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enhanced Marriha fruit fresh yield by 23% without salt stress.

Taxon
Marrihae0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Outcome
fruit fresh yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
nonstressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement in fruit fresh yield due to AMF inoculation was 26 and 23% under nonstressed and 28 and 46% under salt stressed treatments for Pello and Marriha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enhanced Pello fruit fresh yield by 28% under salt stress.

Taxon
Pelloe0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Outcome
fruit fresh yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
28e0
Qualifier
salt stressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement in fruit fresh yield due to AMF inoculation was 26 and 23% under nonstressed and 28 and 46% under salt stressed treatments for Pello and Marriha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation enhanced Marriha fruit fresh yield by 46% under salt stress.

Taxon
Marrihae0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Outcome
fruit fresh yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
46%e0
Qualifier
salt stressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement in fruit fresh yield due to AMF inoculation was 26 and 23% under nonstressed and 28 and 46% under salt stressed treatments for Pello and Marriha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation raised fruit P, potassium and zinc content in both cultivars under both salt conditions.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
AMF inoculatede0
Outcome
fruit contents of P, potassium (K), zinc (Zn)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“For both cultivars, fruit contents of P, potassium (K), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) were higher in AMF inoculated compared with uninoculated plants grown under nonstressed and salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation raised fruit copper and iron content in both cultivars under both salt conditions.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
AMF inoculatede0
Outcome
copper (Cu), and iron (Fe)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“For both cultivars, fruit contents of P, potassium (K), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) were higher in AMF inoculated compared with uninoculated plants grown under nonstressed and salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation lowered fruit sodium concentration under salt stress.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
AMF inoculatede0
Outcome
Fruit Na concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit Na concentrations were lower in AMF inoculated than uninoculated plants grown under salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1896 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-induced acquisition of P, K and Zn under salt stress was more pronounced in Marriha than Pello.

Taxon
cultivare0
Material
Marrihae0
Outcome
P, K, Zne0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
Pelloe0

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement in P, K, Zn, Cu, and Fe acquisition due to AMF inoculation was more pronounced in Marriha than in Pello cultivar under salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2057 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-induced acquisition of Cu and Fe under salt stress was more pronounced in Marriha than Pello.

Taxon
cultivare0
Material
Marrihae0
Outcome
Cu, and Fe acquisitione0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
Pelloe0

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement in P, K, Zn, Cu, and Fe acquisition due to AMF inoculation was more pronounced in Marriha than in Pello cultivar under salt stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted AMF inoculation as increasing tomato salt tolerance.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
AMF inoculatede0
Outcome
tolerance to salt stresse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
unioculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculated plants had greater tolerance to salt stress than unioculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2099–2182 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · disease · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · disease · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 11 positive, 20 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.