Abstract
Abstract Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea L. var. “Florigiant”) were made from plants grown to maturity on soils supplying inadequate and adequate (with fertilization) levels of these nutrients. The characteristics of boron and calcium deficiencies were distinctive and strikingly different. Boron deficiency seemed to affect all parts of the plant. It changed foliage characteristics, flowering pattern, and usually increased shoot and root yields. However, the deficiency decreased fruit yield and caused poor quality of fruit. In contrast, calcium deficiency seemed to affect only fruit yield and quality. Without calcium the yield usually was lower and the quality of the seed poorer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Boron deficiency usually increased shoot and root yields of peanut compared with normal plants.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Material
- Florigiante2
- Organ / stage
- shoot and roote3
- Treatment
- boron deficiencye1
- Outcome
- shoot and root yieldse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Qualifier
- usuallye3
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e2“Florigiant”
e3“It changed foliage characteristics, flowering pattern, and usually increased shoot and root yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron deficiency decreased fruit yield of peanut compared with normal plants.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Florigiante2
- Treatment
- boron deficiencye1
- Outcome
- fruit yielde3
- Direction
- decreasede3
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e2“Florigiant”
e3“However, the deficiency decreased fruit yield and caused poor quality of fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron deficiency caused poor fruit quality in peanut compared with normal plants.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- boron deficiencye1
- Outcome
- quality of fruite3
- Direction
- poore3
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e3“However, the deficiency decreased fruit yield and caused poor quality of fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Without calcium the peanut yield usually was lower than in normal plants.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Without calciume2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Qualifier
- usuallye2
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e2“Without calcium the yield usually was lower and the quality of the seed poorer”
Claim · model-written summary
Without calcium the seed quality of peanut was poorer than in normal plants.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Without calciume2
- Outcome
- quality of the seede2
- Direction
- poorere2
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e2“Without calcium the yield usually was lower and the quality of the seed poorer”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron deficiency changed foliage characteristics and flowering pattern of peanut.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- boron deficiencye1
- Outcome
- foliage characteristics, flowering patterne2
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e2“It changed foliage characteristics, flowering pattern, and usually increased shoot and root yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron deficiency seemed to affect all parts of the peanut plant.
- Taxon
- Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Boron deficiencye2
- Outcome
- all parts of the plante2
- Comparator
- normal peanutse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arachis hypogaea L.”
e1“Comparisons of calcium and boron deficiency and normal peanuts”
e2“Boron deficiency seemed to affect all parts of the plant”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →calcium atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- negative
- negative
- no effect
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →calcium atom · quality: general · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →boron atom · quality: general · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.