Paper · 2009 · Crop Science

QTL Analysis of Root Architecture Traits and Low Phosphorus Tolerance in an Andean Bean Population

Karen A. Cichy; Matthew W. Blair; Carlos H. Galeano Mendoza; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
63
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tolerance to low P soils is a desirable trait in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars grown in acid‐weathered soils. Genetic variability in response to P‐deficient soils exists in the Andean gene pool. G19833, a low P–tolerant indeterminate Andean landrace, has been evaluated for quantitative trait loci (QTL) and tolerance to low P in combination with Mesoamerican parents. Our goal was to expand our understanding of phenotypic traits and QTL from G19833 expressed in an Andean background. An F 5:7 recombinant inbred line (RIL) population developed from two Andean bean genotypes, G19833 and AND696, a determinate line susceptible to low P soils, was examined under low and high soil P levels in replicated field trials. Phosphorus uptake was reduced by 70% and yield by 60% in low P compared to high P treatments. A linkage map was developed with 11 linkage groups and a total length of 1105 cM. Quantitative trait loci for root growth, seed yield, seed P content, and P use efficiency colocalized near the fin gene on linkage group B1. Quantitative trait loci for root growth traits, seed yield, and P uptake colocalized on B11. Quantitative trait loci for root length density (cm cm −3 ) and root surface area (cm 2 ) did not colocalize with QTL for P uptake. This study indicates that root traits did not play an important role in tolerance to low P soil in an Andean × Andean cross, contrary to previous results with the same P‐efficient Andean parent (G19833) crossed to a Mesoamerican bean genotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil phosphorus reduced phosphorus uptake by 70%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
low Pe0
Outcome
Phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
high Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus uptake was reduced by 70% and yield by 60% in low P compared to high P treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil phosphorus reduced yield by 60%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
low Pe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
high Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus uptake was reduced by 70% and yield by 60% in low P compared to high P treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A linkage map comprised 11 linkage groups spanning 1105 cM.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
linkage mape0
Value
1105 cMe0
Qualifier
11 linkage groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A linkage map was developed with 11 linkage groups and a total length of 1105 cM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QTL for root growth, seed yield, seed P and P use efficiency colocalized near fin on B1.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Gene
fin genee0
Outcome
Quantitative trait loci for root growth, seed yield, seed P content, and P use efficiency colocalizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quantitative trait loci for root growth, seed yield, seed P content, and P use efficiency colocalized near the fin gene on linkage group B1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QTL for root growth, seed yield and P uptake colocalized on B11.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
Quantitative trait loci for root growth traits, seed yield, and P uptake colocalized on B11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quantitative trait loci for root growth traits, seed yield, and P uptake colocalized on B11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QTL for root length density and root surface area did not colocalize with P uptake QTL.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
did not colocalize with QTL for P uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quantitative trait loci for root length density (cm cm −3 ) and root surface area (cm 2 ) did not colocalize with QTL for P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root traits were interpreted as unimportant to low-P tolerance in this Andean cross.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
tolerance to low P soile0
Qualifier
Andean × Andean crosse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root traits did not play an important role in tolerance to low P soil in an Andean × Andean cross”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1409 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 21 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 96 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.