Paper · 1976 · Annals of Applied Biology

Competition by, and chemical control of, natural weed populations in spring‐sown field beans (Vicia faba)

J. L. GLASGOW; J. W. DICKS; D. R. HODGSON

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A field experiment was done in 1974 to determine the effect of the presence of weeds for different periods on the yield of field beans ( Vicia faba cv. Maris Bead). A critical period of weed competition of 2 wk duration occurred from 3 to 5 wk after 50% crop emergence. When weeds were not controlled, seed yield was reduced by 46%, from 4–6 to 2–5 t/ha. In another experiment, in 1975, there was no evidence of a critical period. Seed yield was reduced by 48%, from 2–9 to 1–5 t/ha, when weeds were not controlled. Pre‐emergence applications of simazine and of dimefuron, a new soil‐residual herbicide, effectively controlled weeds and bean seed yields were similar to those of the regularly hand‐weeded control. Dinoseb‐acetate and early, but not late, post‐emergence applications of dimefuron controlled weeds satisfactorily. Dimefuron is potentially useful in spring‐sown field beans because it can be applied pre‐ or early post‐emergence without damaging the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A two-week critical weed competition period occurred three to five weeks after 50% crop emergence in 1974.

Taxon
field beanst0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
critical period of weed competitione0
Value
2 wke0
Qualifier
3 to 5 wk after 50% crop emergencee0

Verbatim

e0

“A critical period of weed competition of 2 wk duration occurred from 3 to 5 wk after 50% crop emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled weeds reduced 1974 bean seed yield by 46%.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
weeds were not controllede0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46%e0
Qualifier
from 4–6 to 2–5 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When weeds were not controlled, seed yield was reduced by 46%, from 4–6 to 2–5 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–362 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1975 experiment found no evidence of a critical weed competition period.

Taxon
field beanst0
Interactor
weedt0weede0
Outcome
no evidence of a critical periode0

Verbatim

e0

“In another experiment, in 1975, there was no evidence of a critical period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed populations in spring‐sown field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled weeds reduced 1975 seed yield by 48%.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
weeds were not controllede0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48%e0
Qualifier
from 2–9 to 1–5 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield was reduced by 48%, from 2–9 to 1–5 t/ha, when weeds were not controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence simazine controlled weeds effectively.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Pre‐emergence applications of simazinee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
effectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence applications of simazine and of dimefuron, a new soil‐residual herbicide, effectively controlled weeds and bean seed yields were similar to those of the regularly hand‐weeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence dimefuron controlled weeds effectively.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
dimefurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
effectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence applications of simazine and of dimefuron, a new soil‐residual herbicide, effectively controlled weeds and bean seed yields were similar to those of the regularly hand‐weeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence simazine gave bean seed yields similar to regular hand weeding.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Pre‐emergence applications of simazinee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
bean seed yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
regularly hand‐weeded controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence applications of simazine and of dimefuron, a new soil‐residual herbicide, effectively controlled weeds and bean seed yields were similar to those of the regularly hand‐weeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence dimefuron gave bean seed yields similar to regular hand weeding.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
dimefurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
bean seed yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
regularly hand‐weeded controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence applications of simazine and of dimefuron, a new soil‐residual herbicide, effectively controlled weeds and bean seed yields were similar to those of the regularly hand‐weeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinoseb-acetate satisfactorily controlled weeds.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Dinoseb‐acetatee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
satisfactorilye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dinoseb‐acetate and early, but not late, post‐emergence applications of dimefuron controlled weeds satisfactorily.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early post-emergence dimefuron satisfactorily controlled weeds.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
early, but not late, post‐emergence applications of dimefurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
satisfactorilye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dinoseb‐acetate and early, but not late, post‐emergence applications of dimefuron controlled weeds satisfactorily.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late post-emergence dimefuron did not satisfactorily control weeds.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
late, post‐emergence applications of dimefurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
not latee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dinoseb‐acetate and early, but not late, post‐emergence applications of dimefuron controlled weeds satisfactorily.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered dimefuron potentially useful in spring-sown field beans because pre- or early post-emergence use did not damage the crop.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
Dimefurone0
Outcome
potentially useful in spring‐sown field beanse0

Verbatim

e0

“Dimefuron is potentially useful in spring‐sown field beans because it can be applied pre‐ or early post‐emergence without damaging the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–977 · show in text ↑

simazine · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · weed · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

herbicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.