Paper · 1995 · Journal of Food Science

Microwave Pre‐treatment for Sun‐Dried Raisins

A. E. KOSTAROPOULOS; G. D. SARAVACOS

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
130
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Commercial sun‐drying of raisins requires a long time, and chemical pretreatments are used to increase the drying rate. The feasibility of improving the sun‐drying process of grapes by microwaves was investigated. Sultana seedless grapes, dipped in alkali solution, were pre‐treated in a domestic microwave oven and dried by direct solar radiation. Microwave pre treatment reduced the moisture content by 10–20%. The microwave‐treated grapes dried nearly two times faster than the controls. Blanching in boiling water had the same effect on the drying rate as microwaves. Color and appearance of treated grapes were comparable to commercial products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave pre treatment reduced grape moisture content by 10–20%

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Microwave pre treatmente1
Outcome
moisture contente1
Direction
reducede1
Value
10–20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana seedless grapes, dipped in alkali solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–273 · show in text ↑
e1

“Microwave pre treatment reduced the moisture content by 10–20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-treated grapes dried nearly two times faster than controls

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Microwave pre treatmente1
Outcome
drying ratee3
Direction
fastere2
Value
nearly two timese2
Comparator
the controlse2

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana seedless grapes, dipped in alkali solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–273 · show in text ↑
e1

“Microwave pre treatment reduced the moisture content by 10–20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–420 · show in text ↑
e2

“dried nearly two times faster than the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–498 · show in text ↑
e3

“Blanching in boiling water had the same effect on the drying rate as microwaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanching in boiling water had the same drying-rate effect on grapes as microwave treatment

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Blanching in boiling watere3
Outcome
drying ratee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
microwavese3

Verbatim

e0

“Sultana seedless grapes, dipped in alkali solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–273 · show in text ↑
e3

“Blanching in boiling water had the same effect on the drying rate as microwaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color and appearance of microwave-treated grapes were comparable to commercial products

Taxon
grapese4
Outcome
Color and appearancee4
Direction
comparablee4
Comparator
commercial productse4

Verbatim

e4

“Color and appearance of treated grapes were comparable to commercial products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–658 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

processing · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.