Paper · 2008 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Performance of prohexadione-calcium on shoot growth and fruit quality of apple — Effect of spray surfactants

J. A. Cline; C. G. Embree; J. Hebb; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Vegetative growth control of apples (Malus × domestica Borkh.) is necessary to maintain a balance between growth and cropping. Pruning is a labour-intensive management practice to achieve this and intrinsically stimulates new growth. Prohexadione-calcium (PC) is a plant bio-regulator that effectively regulat es the shoot extension growth of apples and other tree fruits. Previous research has demonstrated that its efficacy can vary based on the use of spray surfactants and adjuvants. This study investigated the efficacy of two rates of Apogee™, the commercial form of PC, used in combination with the spray surfactants Sylgard 309 and LI 700, on extension shoot growth and yield parameters. Experiments were conducted in Ontario on Empire and Nova Scotia on Royal Court™ Cortland apples. Treatments of 0, 75 or 125 mg L -1 PC, with and without either 0.5% (vol/vol.) LI 700 surfactant or 0.05% (vol/vol) Sylgard 309 surfactant were applied to Empire trees, and 75 or 125 mg L -1 PC, with or without 0.5% (vol/vol) LI 700, were applied to Royal Court™ trees. An untreated control treatment was also included for comparison purposes. A total of two sprays were applied to the Empire trees and a total of three sprays were applied to the Royal Court™ trees. PC significantly decreased the vegetative growth of Empire and Royal Court™ trees by approximately 18 to 44%, respectively, and the efficacy of PC was enhanced when combined with either Sylgard 309 or LI 700 surfactant. No additional benefit in vegetative growth control was gained when using Apogee™ at rates of 125 mg L -1 PC, relative to 75 mg L -1 PC. The rate of Apogee™ did not influence the number of fruit or yield per tree or mean fruit size of either cultivar. For Empire, LI 700 and Sylgard 309 significantly reduced the number of fruit per tree, resulting in lower yields and crop densities. In addition, higher mean fruit weights, and a greater distribution of fruit in the larger size categories were observed for LI 700. Fruit from Royal Court trees treated with the highest rate of Apogee™ had higher crop densities, poorer coloured fruit, and a higher percentage of fruit less than 60 mm in diameter. These data provide support for the use of alternative surfactants with Apogee™ other than those listed on the US and Canadian product labels. Key words: Apogee™, Empire, Cortland, Regalis, calcium 3-oxido-5-oxo-4-propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylate, surfactant

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione-calcium reduced vegetative growth of Empire apple trees by approximately 18%.

Material
Empiree0
Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PC significantly decreased the vegetative growth of Empire and Royal Court™ trees by approximately 18 to 44%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione-calcium reduced vegetative growth of Royal Court apple trees by approximately 44%.

Material
Royal Court™e0
Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PC significantly decreased the vegetative growth of Empire and Royal Court™ trees by approximately 18 to 44%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sylgard 309 enhanced prohexadione-calcium control of apple vegetative growth.

Treatment
Sylgard 309e0
Outcome
efficacy of PCe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
PCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of PC was enhanced when combined with either Sylgard 309 or LI 700 surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LI 700 enhanced prohexadione-calcium control of apple vegetative growth.

Treatment
LI 700 surfactante0
Outcome
efficacy of PCe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
PCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of PC was enhanced when combined with either Sylgard 309 or LI 700 surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Apogee from 75 to 125 mg L -1 PC gave no additional vegetative growth control.

Treatment
Apogee™ at rates of 125 mg L -1 PCe0
Outcome
vegetative growth controle0
Direction
No additional benefite0
Comparator
75 mg L -1 PCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No additional benefit in vegetative growth control was gained when using Apogee™ at rates of 125 mg L -1 PC, relative to 75 mg L -1 PC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apogee rate did not influence fruit count, yield per tree or mean fruit size in either cultivar.

Treatment
rate of Apogee™e0
Outcome
number of fruit or yield per tree or mean fruit sizee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of Apogee™ did not influence the number of fruit or yield per tree or mean fruit size of either cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LI 700 reduced fruit number, yield and crop density in Empire apples.

Material
Empiree0
Treatment
LI 700e0
Outcome
number of fruit per treee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
lower yields and crop densitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Empire, LI 700 and Sylgard 309 significantly reduced the number of fruit per tree, resulting in lower yields and crop densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sylgard 309 reduced fruit number, yield and crop density in Empire apples.

Material
Empiree0
Treatment
Sylgard 309e0
Outcome
number of fruit per treee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
lower yields and crop densitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Empire, LI 700 and Sylgard 309 significantly reduced the number of fruit per tree, resulting in lower yields and crop densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LI 700 increased Empire apple mean fruit weight and share of fruit in larger size categories.

Treatment
LI 700e0
Outcome
mean fruit weightse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
greater distribution of fruit in the larger size categoriese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher mean fruit weights, and a greater distribution of fruit in the larger size categories were observed for LI 700.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–1995 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Royal Court apples receiving the highest Apogee rate had higher crop densities.

Material
Royal Courte0
Treatment
highest rate of Apogee™e0
Outcome
crop densitiese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from Royal Court trees treated with the highest rate of Apogee™ had higher crop densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2091 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Royal Court apples receiving the highest Apogee rate had poorer fruit color.

Material
Royal Courte0
Treatment
highest rate of Apogee™e0
Outcome
coloured fruite0
Direction
poorere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from Royal Court trees treated with the highest rate of Apogee™ had higher crop densities, poorer coloured fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2114 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Royal Court apples receiving the highest Apogee rate had a higher share of fruit below 60 mm diameter.

Material
Royal Courte0
Treatment
highest rate of Apogee™e0
Outcome
percentage of fruit less than 60 mm in diametere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from Royal Court trees treated with the highest rate of Apogee™ had higher crop densities, poorer coloured fruit, and a higher percentage of fruit less than 60 mm in diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2177 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support using alternative surfactants with Apogee beyond those on US and Canadian labels.

Outcome
use of alternative surfactants with Apogee™e0
Qualifier
other than those listed on the US and Canadian product labelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These data provide support for the use of alternative surfactants with Apogee™ other than those listed on the US and Canadian product labels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2319 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑

prohexadione-calcium · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

prohexadione-calcium · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

surfactant · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.