Paper · 2012 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Dairy Manure and Rice Planting Methods on Yield, Soil Quality, Water-Use Efficiency, and Economics of Rice and Succeeding Wheat Crop

Muhammad Tahir; Anwar-ul-Hassan Khan; Munaza Batool; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Presently, directly seeded rice (DSR) is preferred over transplanted puddle rice (TPR) because of its high water-use efficiency (WUE). Also, TPR deteriorates the soil physicochemical properties, so in these conditions dairy manure has been used to reduce bulk density, increase hydraulic conductivity, and improve soil nutrient status. Experiments were conducted to study the effects of manure and rice planting methods on yield, soil quality, WUE, and economics of rice and the succeeding wheat crop. Results showed that TPR increased kernel yield by 10.26% compared to DSR. However, it deteriorated soil physical properties and reduced soil nitrogen by 7.31% at 0–15 cm deep and nitrate concentration by 61.40% at 0–35 cm deep, which significantly reduced succeeding wheat yield by 18.21%. The residual soil organic fertility after crop harvest was proportional to the level of dairy manure used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted puddle rice increased kernel yield by 10.26% over directly seeded rice.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
kernel yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.26%e0
Comparator
DSRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPR increased kernel yield by 10.26% compared to DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“directly seeded rice (DSR) is preferred over transplanted puddle rice (TPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted puddle rice deteriorated soil physical properties.

Treatment
TPRe1
Outcome
soil physical propertiese0
Direction
deterioratede0
Comparator
DSRe1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it deteriorated soil physical properties and reduced soil nitrogen by 7.31% at 0–15 cm deep and nitrate concentration by 61.40% at 0–35 cm deep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“TPR increased kernel yield by 10.26% compared to DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–575 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice and the succeeding wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted puddle rice reduced soil nitrogen by 7.31% at 0–15 cm.

Treatment
TPRe1
Outcome
soil nitrogene0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.31%e0
Qualifier
0–15 cm deepe0
Comparator
DSRe1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil nitrogen by 7.31% at 0–15 cm deep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“TPR increased kernel yield by 10.26% compared to DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted puddle rice reduced soil nitrate concentration by 61.40% at 0–35 cm.

Treatment
TPRe1
Outcome
nitrate concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61.40%e0
Qualifier
0–35 cm deepe0
Comparator
DSRe1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil nitrogen by 7.31% at 0–15 cm deep and nitrate concentration by 61.40% at 0–35 cm deep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“TPR increased kernel yield by 10.26% compared to DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Succeeding wheat yield was significantly reduced by 18.21% under the preceding transplanted rice treatment.

Treatment
TPRe1
Outcome
succeeding wheat yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18.21%e0
Comparator
DSRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which significantly reduced succeeding wheat yield by 18.21%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“TPR increased kernel yield by 10.26% compared to DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–575 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil organic fertility rose in proportion to dairy manure level.

Treatment
level of dairy manure usede0
Outcome
residual soil organic fertilitye0
Direction
proportionale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The residual soil organic fertility after crop harvest was proportional to the level of dairy manure used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–898 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.