Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct seeding of preceding rice increased wheat dry matter accumulation over other seeding methods.

A claim from Effect of tillage on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in wheat after rice in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding of preceding rice increased wheat dry matter accumulation over other seeding methods.

Treatment
direct seeding of ricee0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
254 g/m rowe0
Comparator
other methods of seedinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher dry matter accumulation (254 g/m row) and leaf area index of wheat (3·04) were consistently recorded under direct seeding of rice, which was statistically different from the other methods of seeding adopted in the preceding rice crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1092

Title

Effect of tillage on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in wheat after rice in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India

K. S. GANGWAR; K. K. SINGH; S. K. SHARMA The Journal of Agricultural Science 2004. doi:10.1017/s0021859604004459

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-3af2b4dcc680349cbc9c79816f1173617d724bfacc5e6897fcfa0600c277631a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.