Paper · 1993 · Physiologia Plantarum

Ammonium requirement for radiation‐induced accumulation of polyamines in suspension‐cultured grape cells

Christian Triantaphylides; Louis Nespoulous; Christian Chervin

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of radiation‐mediated free radical production on polyamine metabolism were investigated in grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay) using a cell suspension culture. Putrescine (Put) synthesis was triggered in irradiated cells (0. 5 kGy) only when ammonium was present in the culture medium. Under these conditions. Put accumulated to a continuously high level. As also described for other kinds of stress, the level of spermidine was slightly enhanced and that of spermine unchanged. The role of ammonium was assessed by studying non‐irradiated cell cultures. In the presence of ammonium, a transient increase of both arginine decarboxylase (ADC) activity and of Put synthesis was observed during the lag phase of growth. This Put enhancement was inhibited by difluoromethyl arginine and not by difluoromethyl ornithine, showing that increased Put synthesis occurs via the ADC pathway. When ammonium was withheld from the culture medium. ADC activity was still triggered though transient Put accumulation was completely suppressed. These results emphasize the importance of ammonium availability in cultured cells as a limiting factor for Put production. Polyamine synthesis, therefore, cannot be stimulated by gamma irradiation in the absence of an ammonium supply. These results support the hypothesis that Put synthesis is a detoxification process of the ammonium produced as a result of nitrogen recycling within stressed plant cells.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation triggered putrescine synthesis only with ammonium present.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
irradiated cells (0. 5 kGy)e0
Outcome
Putrescine (Put) synthesise0
Direction
triggerede0
Comparator
only when ammonium was presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Putrescine (Put) synthesis was triggered in irradiated cells (0. 5 kGy) only when ammonium was present in the culture medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine accumulated continuously at a high level under irradiation with ammonium.

Taxon
grapee1
Outcome
Put accumulatede0
Direction
accumulatede0
Qualifier
continuously high levele0

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions. Put accumulated to a continuously high level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermidine level was slightly enhanced.

Taxon
grapee1
Outcome
level of spermidinee0
Direction
enhancede0

Verbatim

e0

“the level of spermidine was slightly enhanced and that of spermine unchanged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–497 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine level was unchanged.

Taxon
grapee1
Outcome
sperminee0
Direction
unchangede0

Verbatim

e0

“the level of spermidine was slightly enhanced and that of spermine unchanged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–497 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium transiently raised ADC activity in nonirradiated grape cells.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
presence of ammoniume0
Outcome
arginine decarboxylase (ADC) activitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the presence of ammonium, a transient increase of both arginine decarboxylase (ADC) activity and of Put synthesis was observed during the lag phase of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium transiently raised Put synthesis in nonirradiated grape cells.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
presence of ammoniume0
Outcome
Put synthesise0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the presence of ammonium, a transient increase of both arginine decarboxylase (ADC) activity and of Put synthesis was observed during the lag phase of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difluoromethyl arginine inhibited Put enhancement.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
difluoromethyl argininee0
Outcome
Put enhancemente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This Put enhancement was inhibited by difluoromethyl arginine and not by difluoromethyl ornithine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difluoromethyl ornithine did not inhibit Put enhancement.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
difluoromethyl ornithinee0
Outcome
Put enhancemente0
Direction
not bye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This Put enhancement was inhibited by difluoromethyl arginine and not by difluoromethyl ornithine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding ammonium still triggered ADC activity.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
ammonium was withhelde0
Outcome
ADC activitye0
Direction
triggerede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When ammonium was withheld from the culture medium. ADC activity was still triggered though transient Put accumulation was completely suppressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding ammonium completely suppressed transient Put accumulation.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
ammonium was withhelde0
Outcome
transient Put accumulatione0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When ammonium was withheld from the culture medium. ADC activity was still triggered though transient Put accumulation was completely suppressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape cells ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gamay)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145 · show in text ↑

ornithine · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.