Paper · 1997 · Plant Disease

Effect of Storage on Viability of Fusarium Head Blight-Affected Spring Wheat Seed

J. Gilbert; A. Tekauz; S. M. Woods

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of storage temperature and duration on germination, emergence, and vigor of Fusarium head blight-affected seed were studied in the spring wheat cvs. Glenlea and Roblin. Seed was stored at -10, 2.5, 10, or 20°C. Germination was assessed at cold (5°C) and moderate 20/15°C for 16/8 h daily) temperatures following 0, 8, 16, and 24 weeks of storage. Emergence from a soilless mix was counted 10 days after planting. Vigor was assessed following germination by measuring root and shoot lengths and in emerged plants by determining dry shoot weights. Germination after storage at the three colder temperatures decreased with length of storage, but storage at 20°C did not affect germination. Overall, germination of Fusarium-affected seed at moderate temperatures was significantly lower than for healthy seed. Germination of infected seed at 5°C was better than at moderate temperatures, probably due to lack of fungal activity at low temperatures. Seed treatment with Vitaflo 280 improved germination, but not emergence, of infected seed. However, roots from treated infected seed were shorter than from untreated seed. Emergence of infected seeds was better after storage at 10 and 20°C than at -10 and 2.5°C. Storage temperature did not significantly affect vigor. Dry shoot weight at 14 days was lower after storage at -10 than at 20°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination declined with storage duration at the three colder temperatures.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage at the three colder temperaturese0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination after storage at the three colder temperatures decreased with length of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 20°C did not affect germination.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage at 20°Ce0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storage at 20°C did not affect germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At moderate germination temperatures, Fusarium-affected seed germinated significantly less than healthy seed.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fusarium-affected seede0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination of Fusarium-affected seed at moderate temperatures was significantly lower than for healthy seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected seed germinated better at 5°C than at moderate temperatures.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
5°Ce0
Outcome
Germination of infected seede0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
moderate temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of infected seed at 5°C was better than at moderate temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the better low-temperature germination to lack of fungal activity.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Germination of infected seede1
Qualifier
lack of fungal activity at low temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“probably due to lack of fungal activity at low temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“Germination of infected seed at 5°C was better than at moderate temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitaflo 280 improved germination of infected seed.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Seed treatment with Vitaflo 280e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with Vitaflo 280 improved germination, but not emergence, of infected seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitaflo 280 did not improve emergence of infected seed.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Seed treatment with Vitaflo 280e0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with Vitaflo 280 improved germination, but not emergence, of infected seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots from treated infected seed were shorter than those from untreated seed.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treated infected seede0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
untreated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots from treated infected seed were shorter than from untreated seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected seed emerged better after storage at 10 and 20°C than after -10 and 2.5°C.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage at 10 and 20°Ce0
Outcome
Emergence of infected seedse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
-10 and 2.5°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emergence of infected seeds was better after storage at 10 and 20°C than at -10 and 2.5°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage temperature did not significantly affect vigor.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Storage temperaturee0
Outcome
vigore0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storage temperature did not significantly affect vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry shoot weight at 14 days was lower after -10°C storage than 20°C storage.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage at -10e0
Outcome
Dry shoot weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
at 14 dayse0
Comparator
20°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry shoot weight at 14 days was lower after storage at -10 than at 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑

Fusarium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Wheat seed stored in a refrigerator had the highest germination percentage

    Effect of storage containers and time on seed quality of wheat · 1970 · compared with polyethylene bag, tin container and earthen pitcher

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

infection · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 13 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.