Paper · 1977 · Agronomy Journal

Response of Oats to Water Deficit. I. Physiological Characteristics1

B. S. Sandhu; M. L. Horton

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Although an insufficient supply of water is commonly associated with reduced crop yields, the manner in which water deficits affect the functioning of many common field crops is not well established. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of a water deficit on some physiological processes of spring oats ( Avena sativa L. ‘Jaycee’). The plants were subjected to water deficits under a field environment for 9 to 11 days at the boot stage, at anthesis through early grain formation stage, and at both stages in combination. Relative leaf water content (RLWC) as determined by the relative turgidity method was used as a measure of water deficit. Leaf diffusion resistance (LDR) was monitored using a diffusion porometer. The net photosynthetic rate (NPR) of the oat plants was determined using an infrared gas analyzer. Severe water stress at all stages of development studied caused about an 80% decline in NPR. LDR increased with a decrease in RLWC. Stress during boot stage reduced the photosynthetic sensivity of the plants to subsequent stress at the anthesis through early grain formation stage. On rewatering, LDR and RLWC recovered completely within 1 to 6 days; however, the net photosynthetic rate of plants stressed at the anthesis through grain formation stage showed a more gradual and incomplete recovery than plants stressed at other stages. The plants stressed during boot stage alone, but adequately watered thereafter, exhibited significantly higher NPR than the control plants. The results indicate that leaf diffusion resistance and net photosynthetic rate of oats show acute sensitivity to plant water deficits. Hence, these parameters hold promise as aids in determining permissible water deficit limits and in irrigation scheduling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress caused about an 80% decline in oat net photosynthetic rate at all studied stages.

Taxon
spring oatsAvena sativae0
Material
Jayceee0
Treatment
Severe water stresse1
Outcome
NPRe1
Direction
declinee1
Value
80%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring oats ( Avena sativa L. ‘Jaycee’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“Severe water stress at all stages of development studied caused about an 80% decline in NPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–935 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf diffusion resistance increased as relative leaf water content decreased.

Organ / stage
Leafe2
Outcome
LDRe1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
decrease in RLWCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“LDR increased with a decrease in RLWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–974 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf diffusion resistance (LDR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boot-stage stress reduced photosynthetic sensitivity to later anthesis-to-grain-formation stress.

Taxon
spring oatsAvena sativae0
Treatment
Stress during boot stagee1
Outcome
photosynthetic sensivitye1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
subsequent stress at the anthesis through early grain formation stagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stress during boot stage reduced the photosynthetic sensivity of the plants to subsequent stress at the anthesis through early grain formation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf diffusion resistance and relative leaf water content recovered completely within 1 to 6 days after rewatering.

Treatment
rewateringe1
Outcome
LDR and RLWCe1
Direction
recovered completelye1
Value
1 to 6 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“On rewatering, LDR and RLWC recovered completely within 1 to 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic recovery after anthesis-to-grain-formation stress was slower and incomplete relative to other stress stages.

Treatment
stressed at the anthesis through grain formation stagee1
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
more gradual and incomplete recoverye1
Comparator
plants stressed at other stagese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“the net photosynthetic rate of plants stressed at the anthesis through grain formation stage showed a more gradual and incomplete recovery than plants stressed at other stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants stressed only at boot stage had significantly higher photosynthetic rate than controls after adequate watering.

Treatment
stressed during boot stage alonee1
Outcome
NPRe1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
adequately watered thereaftere1
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants stressed during boot stage alone, but adequately watered thereafter, exhibited significantly higher NPR than the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1519 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed leaf diffusion resistance and net photosynthetic rate as aids for water deficit limits and irrigation scheduling.

Outcome
aids in determining permissible water deficit limits and in irrigation schedulinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf diffusion resistance and net photosynthetic rate of oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1608 · show in text ↑
e1

“these parameters hold promise as aids in determining permissible water deficit limits and in irrigation scheduling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1778 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf diffusion resistance and net photosynthetic rate of oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1608 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.