Paper · 1984 · Journal of Phytopathology

Effect of Alfalfa Wilts on the Hydroxyproline Content in Cell Wall

J. Krátká; V. Kůdela

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The Hyp content was studied in cell wall of alfalfa susceptible and resistant strains on the 3rd, the 7th and on the 14th day after inoculation with Verticillium albo‐atrum or Corynebacterium michiganense pv. insidiosum. The changes of Hyp content after inoculation with both pathogens were markedly expressed in alfalfa roots. Resistant plants of R 337 strain responded to inoculation with V. albo‐atrum or C. michiganense pv. insidiosum by the decrease of Hyp content mainly on the 3rd and on the 7th day. On the 14th day after inoculation Hyp content practically did not differ from that of the control. Susceptible plants of S 354 and S 321 srains responded to inoculation with wilt pathogens by the slight decrease of Hyp content at the 3rd day after inoculation. A significant increase of Hyp content was found on the 7th and mainly on the 14th day after inoculation in comparison with control plants. The cell wall Hyp content was also determined with 7 R‐strains and 7 S‐strains at 120 days after inoculation with both pathogens. In each R and S strain two categories of plants were used for chemical analyses: Wilt‐free plants (0 to 1 classes) and diseased, wilted plants (2 to 6 classes). In the resistant alfalfa strains no differences in Hyp content between the wilt‐free and diseased plants were found. In the susceptible alfalfa strains the Hyp content was significantly higher in roots of diseased plants comparing with the wilt‐free ones. Only negligible changes in Hyp content were registered in the overground parts of all inoculated alfalfa strains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen induced Hyp changes were pronounced in alfalfa roots.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
inoculation with both pathogense0
Outcome
Hyp contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The changes of Hyp content after inoculation with both pathogens were markedly expressed in alfalfa roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant R 337 roots had decreased Hyp after Verticillium inoculation on days 3 and 7.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
R 337e0
Treatment
inoculation with V. albo‐atrume0
Interactor
V. albo‐atrume0pathogent1
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
3rd and on the 7th daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistant plants of R 337 strain responded to inoculation with V. albo‐atrum or C. michiganense pv. insidiosum by the decrease of Hyp content mainly on the 3rd and on the 7th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant R 337 roots had decreased Hyp after Corynebacterium inoculation on days 3 and 7.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
R 337e0
Treatment
inoculation with V. albo‐atrum or C. michiganense pv. insidiosume0
Interactor
C. michiganense pv. insidiosume0pathogent1
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
3rd and on the 7th daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistant plants of R 337 strain responded to inoculation with V. albo‐atrum or C. michiganense pv. insidiosum by the decrease of Hyp content mainly on the 3rd and on the 7th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 14 resistant plants had Hyp comparable to control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
14th daye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the 14th day after inoculation Hyp content practically did not differ from that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible strains showed slight Hyp decreases on day 3.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
S 354 and S 321e0
Treatment
inoculation with wilt pathogense0
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
3rd daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Susceptible plants of S 354 and S 321 srains responded to inoculation with wilt pathogens by the slight decrease of Hyp content at the 3rd day after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible plants showed significant Hyp increases on days 7 and 14 versus control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
7th and mainly on the 14th daye0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase of Hyp content was found on the 7th and mainly on the 14th day after inoculation in comparison with control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant strains had no Hyp differences between wilt free and diseased plants.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
resistant alfalfa strainse0
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
wilt‐free and diseased plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the resistant alfalfa strains no differences in Hyp content between the wilt‐free and diseased plants were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1323 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased susceptible plants had higher root Hyp than wilt free ones.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
susceptible alfalfa strainse0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wilt‐free onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the susceptible alfalfa strains the Hyp content was significantly higher in roots of diseased plants comparing with the wilt‐free ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground Hyp changed negligibly after inoculation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
overground partse0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
Hyp contente0
Direction
negligible changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only negligible changes in Hyp content were registered in the overground parts of all inoculated alfalfa strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1576 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 67 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.