Paper · 2004 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Effect of Timing and Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.). I. Growth Dynamics and Seed Yield

P. Barłóg; W. Grzebisz

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The field experiments conducted on the grey‐brown podzolic soil in the four growing seasons (1998–2001) at Krzeslice Farm, central‐western Poland comprised seven fertilization variants: 80 NF + 80 CAN ; 80 CAN + 80 CAN ; 80 AN + 80 AN ; 80 NF + 50 CAN + 30 CN ; 80 CAN + 50 CAN +30 CN ; 80 AN + 50 AN + 30 CN (where NF – nitrofos NPK; CAN – calcium‐ammonium nitrate; AN – ammonium nitrate; CN – calcium nitrate) and control (without N) applied in split rates at the beginning of spring regrowth (80 kg N ha −1 ), stem elongation (80 or 50) and flower buds visible stages (30). The yielding effect of tested fertilization variants was significant in comparison with the control (2.24 t ha −1 ). The highest mean seed yield (3.64 t ha −1 ) was collected from 80 AN + 80 AN and 80 CAN + 80 CAN variants. Mean values of 4 years indicate that the second N rate division (80 + 50 + 30) decreased yield, although not significantly in comparison with these two N treatments. Plants grown on these treatments have developed different patterns of growth to yield the seeds. These patterns were characterized by very high crop growth rate during flowering (above 21 g m −2 day −1 ) and negative at maturation (down to −2.5 g m −2 day −1 ). Plants fertilized with ammonium nitrate (80 AN + 80 AN ) reached maximum growth rate earlier (65 days), which lasted longer (20 days) than plants fertilized with calcium‐ammonium nitrate (71 days lasting 17.5 days). Plants grown on the control treatment reached the highest crop growth rate within 79 days (14.8 g m −2 day −1 ), which lasted 15 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested fertilization significantly affected seed yield relative to the unfertilized control at 2.24 t ha −1.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
tested fertilization variantse0
Outcome
yielding effecte0
Qualifier
2.24 t ha −1e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yielding effect of tested fertilization variants was significant in comparison with the control (2.24 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80 AN + 80 AN produced highest mean seed yield of 3.64 t ha −1.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
80 AN + 80 ANe0
Outcome
mean seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.64 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean seed yield (3.64 t ha −1 ) was collected from 80 AN + 80 AN and 80 CAN + 80 CAN variants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80 CAN + 80 CAN produced highest mean seed yield of 3.64 t ha −1.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
80 CAN + 80 CANe0
Outcome
mean seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.64 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean seed yield (3.64 t ha −1 ) was collected from 80 AN + 80 AN and 80 CAN + 80 CAN variants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting nitrogen 80 + 50 + 30 decreased four-year yield nonsignificantly relative to the two highest-yield treatments.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
80 + 50 + 30e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
Mean values of 4 yearse0
Comparator
these two N treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean values of 4 years indicate that the second N rate division (80 + 50 + 30) decreased yield, although not significantly in comparison with these two N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-yield treatments showed flowering growth rates above 21 g m −2 day −1.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
very highe0
Value
above 21 g m −2 day −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These patterns were characterized by very high crop growth rate during flowering (above 21 g m −2 day −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth rates became negative at maturation, down to −2.5 g m −2 day −1.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
maturatione0
Outcome
negative at maturatione0
Direction
down toe0
Value
−2.5 g m −2 day −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative at maturation (down to −2.5 g m −2 day −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate plants reached maximum growth earlier at 65 days versus calcium-ammonium nitrate at 71 days.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
ammonium nitrate (80 AN + 80 AN )e0
Outcome
maximum growth ratee0
Direction
earliere0
Value
65 dayse0
Qualifier
71 dayse0
Comparator
calcium‐ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with ammonium nitrate (80 AN + 80 AN ) reached maximum growth rate earlier (65 days), which lasted longer (20 days) than plants fertilized with calcium‐ammonium nitrate (71 days lasting 17.5 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum growth lasted longer with ammonium nitrate, 20 days versus 17.5 days.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
ammonium nitrate (80 AN + 80 AN )e0
Outcome
maximum growth ratee0
Direction
longere0
Value
20 dayse0
Qualifier
17.5 dayse0
Comparator
calcium‐ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with ammonium nitrate (80 AN + 80 AN ) reached maximum growth rate earlier (65 days), which lasted longer (20 days) than plants fertilized with calcium‐ammonium nitrate (71 days lasting 17.5 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants attained their peak growth rate within 79 days.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
highest crop growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
79 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown on the control treatment reached the highest crop growth rate within 79 days (14.8 g m −2 day −1 ), which lasted 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control peak crop growth rate was 14.8 g m −2 day −1.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.8 g m −2 day −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown on the control treatment reached the highest crop growth rate within 79 days (14.8 g m −2 day −1 ), which lasted 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control peak growth lasted 15 days.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
highest crop growth ratee0
Value
15 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown on the control treatment reached the highest crop growth rate within 79 days (14.8 g m −2 day −1 ), which lasted 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.