Paper · 1988 · Plant Pathology

Relative effects of Alternaria alternata and A. macrospora on cotton crops in Israel

J. ROTEM; J. EIDT; U. WENDT; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In large commercial fields, the ratio of Alternaria macrospora to A. alternata lesions was 1:0‐4 in cv. Pima and 1:19 in cv. Acala. The frequency of A. alternata on Pima and of A. macrospora on Acala increased in an experimental field with mixed Pima and Acala plots. In both cultivars disease was inhibited by fungicidal treatment and by removal of flowers. For all parameters measured (leaf area, number of leaves, flowers and bolls, and yield), the responses to treatments were greater in Pima than in Acala.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In commercial fields the A. macrospora to A. alternata lesion ratio was 1:0‐4 in Pima.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Pimae0
Interactor
Alternaria macrosporaAlternaria macrosporae0pathogen
Second interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
ratio of Alternaria macrospora to A. alternata lesionse0
Value
1:0‐4e0
Setting
large commercial fieldse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ratio of Alternaria macrospora to A. alternata lesions was 1:0‐4 in cv. Pima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“In large commercial fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In commercial fields the A. macrospora to A. alternata lesion ratio was 1:19 in Acala.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Acalae0
Interactor
Alternaria macrosporaAlternaria macrosporae0pathogen
Second interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
ratio of Alternaria macrospora to A. alternata lesionse0
Value
1:19e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ratio of Alternaria macrospora to A. alternata lesions was 1:0‐4 in cv. Pima and 1:19 in cv. Acala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. alternata frequency on Pima increased in mixed Pima and Acala plots.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Pimae0
Treatment
mixed Pima and Acala plotse0
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
frequency of A. alternata on Pimae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The frequency of A. alternata on Pima and of A. macrospora on Acala increased in an experimental field with mixed Pima and Acala plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. macrospora frequency on Acala increased in mixed Pima and Acala plots.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Acalae0
Treatment
mixed Pima and Acala plotse0
Interactor
A. macrosporaAlternaria macrosporae0pathogen
Outcome
A. macrospora on Acalae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The frequency of A. alternata on Pima and of A. macrospora on Acala increased in an experimental field with mixed Pima and Acala plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicidal treatment inhibited disease in both cultivars.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
fungicidal treatmente0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both cultivars disease was inhibited by fungicidal treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower removal inhibited disease in both cultivars.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
removal of flowerse0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both cultivars disease was inhibited by fungicidal treatment and by removal of flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Responses of leaf area, leaf, flower and boll numbers, and yield to treatments were greater in Pima than Acala.

Taxon
cotton cropsGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Pimae0
Outcome
responses to treatmentse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Acalae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“For all parameters measured (leaf area, number of leaves, flowers and bolls, and yield), the responses to treatments were greater in Pima than in Acala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–510 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.