Paper · 2019 · Revista Caatinga

Ramularia leaf spot effect on yield and fiber quality of cotton submitted to fungicide application

NÉDIO RODRIGO TORMEN; LUIZ EDUARDO BASSAY BLUM

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ramularia leaf spot (RLS) is the major cotton disease in Brazil and one of the main causes of crop yield reduction. The disease causes defoliation reduces photosynthetic capacity and causes premature opening of bolls. Due to the impact of RLS on the production of Brazilian cotton and the lack of scientific publications investigating the disease, the present work aims to evaluate the efficiency of fungicides in controlling disease and their impact on yield and fiber quality. Three field experiments were carried out during the 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 seasons in Planaltina, Federal District and Cristalina, Goiás. Experiments followed a randomized complete block design (4 blocks) and treatments consisted of the application of fungicides, plus a non-treated plot. The fungicide applications began preventively and were repeated every 14 days until six sprays had been completed. Severity of RLS was assessed and used to calculate the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC). Yield and cotton fiber quality were also evaluated. All fungicides had reduced AUDPC and obtained higher cotton yields in relation to the non-treated plot. Strobilurin-group fungicides (azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin and picoxystrobin) showed low effectiveness when sprayed alone. The demethylation inhibitor fungicides (difenoconazole, epoxiconazol, tetraconazol and metconazole) were more effective than the strobilurins. The highest efficiency rates were achieved by application of pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole + fluxapyroxad and fentin hydroxide. Disease severity affected cotton yield, causing losses from 14.8% to 31.7%. Resultant reductions in cotton fiber quality negatively affect the micronaire composition, altering the length, strength and uniformity of fibers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides reduced the area under the disease progress curve for cotton Ramularia leaf spot.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-treated plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fungicides had reduced AUDPC and obtained higher cotton yields in relation to the non-treated plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides raised cotton yield relative to the non-treated plot.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
cotton yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-treated plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fungicides had reduced AUDPC and obtained higher cotton yields in relation to the non-treated plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strobilurin-group fungicides were of low effectiveness when sprayed alone.

Treatment
Strobilurin-group fungicidese0
Outcome
low effectivenesse0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strobilurin-group fungicides (azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin and picoxystrobin) showed low effectiveness when sprayed alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Demethylation inhibitor fungicides were more effective than strobilurins.

Treatment
demethylation inhibitor fungicidese0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
strobilurinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The demethylation inhibitor fungicides (difenoconazole, epoxiconazol, tetraconazol and metconazole) were more effective than the strobilurins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin plus fluxapyroxad attained one of the highest efficiency rates.

Treatment
pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxade0
Outcome
highest efficiency ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest efficiency rates were achieved by application of pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole + fluxapyroxad and fentin hydroxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin plus epoxiconazole plus fluxapyroxad attained one of the highest efficiency rates.

Treatment
pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole + fluxapyroxade0
Outcome
highest efficiency ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest efficiency rates were achieved by application of pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole + fluxapyroxad and fentin hydroxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fentin hydroxide attained one of the highest efficiency rates.

Treatment
fentin hydroxidee0
Outcome
highest efficiency ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest efficiency rates were achieved by application of pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole + fluxapyroxad and fentin hydroxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity caused cotton yield losses of 14.8% to 31.7%.

Interactor
RamulariaRamulariat0pathogen
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
lossese0
Value
14.8% to 31.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ramularia
Ramularia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)TristramBrelstaff · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease severity affected cotton yield, causing losses from 14.8% to 31.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ramularia leaf spot effect on yield and fiber quality of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease-related fiber quality reductions altered cotton micronaire, length, strength, and uniformity.

Interactor
RamulariaRamulariat0pathogen
Outcome
micronaire composition, altering the length, strength and uniformity of fiberse0
Direction
reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ramularia
Ramularia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)TristramBrelstaff · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resultant reductions in cotton fiber quality negatively affect the micronaire composition, altering the length, strength and uniformity of fibers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ramularia leaf spot effect on yield and fiber quality of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.