Paper · 2015 · Southern Forests a Journal of Forest Science

Biology, incidence and host susceptibility ofPineus boerneri(Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in Colombian pine plantations

Carlos A Rodas; Rubén Serna; Maria D Bolaños; et al.

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Adelgids (Hemiptera) in the genus Pineus have been reported as introduced insect pests causing serious losses to Pinus plantations worldwide. In 2008, Pineus boerneri was recorded for the first time in Colombia, with infestations noted on Pinus kesiya, P. tecunumanii, P. maximinoi and P. oocarpa. The lack of information on this insect in Colombia prompted investigations of its life cycle and infestation levels as well as host susceptibility of the main Pinus species planted in Colombia. In addition, the possibility of using a Ceraeochrysa species, an already established predator of adelgids in Colombia, for biological control was considered. Results showed that Pineus boerneri in Colombia has an anholocyclic life cycle comprised of four instars with a complete duration of between 49 and 97 d. Infestations were higher in the middle and upper part of trees. Pinus kesiya and P. maximinoi had the highest levels of susceptibility in field as well as in greenhouse trials. A survey of naturally infested trees showed P. tecunumanii to be moderately susceptible, whereas P. patula and P. oocarpa had low levels of susceptibility in a greenhouse trial but were not susceptible in the field. Investigations considering the impact of predation of Ceraeochrysa species showed a high predation rate of up to 140 P. boerneri consumed per day by a single Ceraeochrysa individual. Other predators of P. boerneri were recorded but were not sufficiently common to warrant detailed study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineus boerneri had an anholocyclic life cycle with four instars lasting 49 to 97 days in Colombia.

Taxon
Pineus boerneriPineus boernerie0
Outcome
an anholocyclic life cycle comprised of four instarse0
Value
between 49 and 97 de0
Setting
Colombiae0

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that Pineus boerneri in Colombia has an anholocyclic life cycle comprised of four instars with a complete duration of between 49 and 97 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adelgid infestations were higher in middle and upper tree parts.

Taxon
pinePinust0
Organ / stage
middle and upper part of treese0
Interactor
Pineus boerneriPineus boernerit0pest
Outcome
Infestationse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestations were higher in the middle and upper part of trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pineus boerneri(Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in Colombian pine plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus kesiya had the highest susceptibility in field and greenhouse trials.

Taxon
Pinus kesiyaPinus kesiyae0
Outcome
levels of susceptibilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
field as well as in greenhouse trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus kesiya
Pinus kesiya · Taxonanne_jimenez on Flickr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinus kesiya and P. maximinoi had the highest levels of susceptibility in field as well as in greenhouse trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–979 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. maximinoi had the highest susceptibility in field and greenhouse trials.

Taxon
P. maximinoiPinus maximinoie0
Outcome
levels of susceptibilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
field as well as in greenhouse trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus maximinoi
Pinus maximinoi · Taxontian2992 from Guatemala, Guatemala · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinus kesiya and P. maximinoi had the highest levels of susceptibility in field as well as in greenhouse trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–979 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. tecunumanii was moderately susceptible among naturally infested trees.

Taxon
P. tecunumaniiPinus tecunumaniie0
Outcome
moderately susceptiblee0
Setting
naturally infested treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus tecunumanii
Pinus tecunumanii · TaxonNatuur12 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A survey of naturally infested trees showed P. tecunumanii to be moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. patula had low susceptibility in greenhouse trials but no susceptibility in the field.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae0
Outcome
low levels of susceptibilitye0
Qualifier
not susceptible in the fielde0
Setting
greenhouse triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas P. patula and P. oocarpa had low levels of susceptibility in a greenhouse trial but were not susceptible in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. oocarpa had low susceptibility in greenhouse trials but no susceptibility in the field.

Taxon
P. oocarpaPinus oocarpae0
Outcome
low levels of susceptibilitye0
Qualifier
not susceptible in the fielde0
Setting
greenhouse triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus oocarpa
Pinus oocarpa · TaxonPerquín 4036.jpg : Metztli derivative work: MPF ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas P. patula and P. oocarpa had low levels of susceptibility in a greenhouse trial but were not susceptible in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Ceraeochrysa individual consumed up to 140 P. boerneri per day.

Taxon
Ceraeochrysa speciesCeraeochrysae0
Interactor
P. boerneriPineus boernerie0pest
Outcome
predation ratee0
Value
up to 140 P. boerneri consumed per daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceraeochrysa
Ceraeochrysa · TaxonChristina Butler from Georgia, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Investigations considering the impact of predation of Ceraeochrysa species showed a high predation rate of up to 140 P. boerneri consumed per day by a single Ceraeochrysa individual”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other P. boerneri predators were recorded but were too uncommon for detailed study.

Taxon
Other predators of P. boernerie0
Interactor
P. boerneriPineus boernerie0pest
Outcome
not sufficiently common to warrant detailed studye0

Verbatim

e0

“Other predators of P. boerneri were recorded but were not sufficiently common to warrant detailed study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1483 · show in text ↑