Paper · 1983 · Phytopathology

Effect of Mulching on Web Blight of Beans in Costa Rica

J. J. Galindo

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Mulching was highly effective and superior to chemical treatments for the control of web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani, the imperfect state of Thanatephorus cucumeris. Plots were established in fields with a history of repeated incidence of WB. Soilborne sclerotia and colonized debris spread by splashing rain were the main sources of inoculum for WB in these fields. Mulching with rice husks (2.5 cm thick) greatly reduced splashing of inoculum and lowered disease severity. At harvest, severity of WB in nontreated and mulched plots planted to cultivar Porrillo 70 was 100 and 13%, and seed yield was 0 and 655 kg/ha, respectively. In a second field with a lower level of inoculum, yield in the nontreated and mulched areas averaged 273 and 835 kg/ha, respectively. Similar results were obtained with cultivar Mexico 27. Mulching with rice husks was superior to PCNB soil drench (40 kg 75 WP/ha) in controlling WB. Seed treatment with benomyl (1 g benomyl, 50% WP, per kilogram of seeds) and soil application of paraquat (1 kg a.i./ha) were ineffective. The local production practice of “frijol tapado,” in which seeds are broadcast in vegetation that is later cut and left as mulch, was as effective as rice husk mulching in reducing the incidence and severity of WB, but yields were lower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching was superior to chemical treatments for controlling web blight in beans caused by Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
Mulchinge1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
control of web blighte1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
chemical treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mulching was highly effective and superior to chemical treatments for the control of web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with rice husks greatly reduced splashing of inoculum in beans.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
Mulching with rice husks (2.5 cm thick)e2
Outcome
splashing of inoculume2
Direction
greatly reducede2

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mulching with rice husks (2.5 cm thick) greatly reduced splashing of inoculum and lowered disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–495 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with rice husks lowered web blight disease severity in beans.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
Mulching with rice husks (2.5 cm thick)e2
Outcome
disease severitye2
Direction
lowerede2

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mulching with rice husks (2.5 cm thick) greatly reduced splashing of inoculum and lowered disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cultivar Porrillo 70, web blight severity at harvest was 100% in nontreated plots and 13% in mulched plots.

Taxon
beanse1
Material
Porrillo 70e4
Treatment
mulched plotse4
Outcome
severity of WBe4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
100 and 13%e4
Comparator
nontreatede4

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e4

“At harvest, severity of WB in nontreated and mulched plots planted to cultivar Porrillo 70 was 100 and 13%, and seed yield was 0 and 655 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cultivar Porrillo 70, seed yield was 0 kg/ha in nontreated plots and 655 kg/ha in mulched plots.

Taxon
beanse1
Material
Porrillo 70e4
Treatment
mulched plotse4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
0 and 655 kg/hae4
Comparator
nontreatede4

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e4

“At harvest, severity of WB in nontreated and mulched plots planted to cultivar Porrillo 70 was 100 and 13%, and seed yield was 0 and 655 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a second field with lower inoculum, yield in nontreated and mulched areas averaged 273 and 835 kg/ha.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
mulched arease3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
273 and 835 kg/hae3
Comparator
nontreatede3
Setting
a second field with a lower level of inoculume3

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e3

“In a second field with a lower level of inoculum, yield in the nontreated and mulched areas averaged 273 and 835 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Results similar to those with Porrillo 70 were obtained with cultivar Mexico 27 in the mulching trial.

Taxon
beanse1
Material
Mexico 27e5
Outcome
Similar resultse5

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e5

“Similar results were obtained with cultivar Mexico 27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with rice husks was superior to a PCNB soil drench in controlling web blight.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
Mulching with rice huskse6
Outcome
controlling WBe6
Direction
superiore6
Comparator
PCNB soil drench (40 kg 75 WP/ha)e6

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e6

“Mulching with rice husks was superior to PCNB soil drench (40 kg 75 WP/ha) in controlling WB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with benomyl was ineffective against web blight in beans.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
Seed treatment with benomyl (1 g benomyl, 50% WP, per kilogram of seeds)e7
Outcome
ineffectivee7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e7

“Seed treatment with benomyl (1 g benomyl, 50% WP, per kilogram of seeds) and soil application of paraquat (1 kg a.i./ha) were ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of paraquat was ineffective against web blight in beans.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
soil application of paraquat (1 kg a.i./ha)e7
Outcome
ineffectivee7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e7

“Seed treatment with benomyl (1 g benomyl, 50% WP, per kilogram of seeds) and soil application of paraquat (1 kg a.i./ha) were ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frijol tapado was as effective as rice husk mulching in reducing the incidence and severity of web blight in beans.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
frijol tapadoe2
Outcome
reducing the incidence and severity of WBe2
Direction
as effectivee2
Comparator
rice husk mulchinge2

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“The local production practice of “frijol tapado,” in which seeds are broadcast in vegetation that is later cut and left as mulch, was as effective as rice husk mulching in reducing the incidence and severity of WB, but yields were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frijol tapado gave lower yields than rice husk mulching in beans.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
frijol tapadoe2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
rice husk mulchinge2

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“The local production practice of “frijol tapado,” in which seeds are broadcast in vegetation that is later cut and left as mulch, was as effective as rice husk mulching in reducing the incidence and severity of WB, but yields were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1313 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soilborne sclerotia and colonized debris spread by splashing rain were the main sources of inoculum for web blight in these beans fields.

Taxon
beanse1
Outcome
main sources of inoculume3
Qualifier
Soilborne sclerotia and colonized debris spread by splashing raine3

Verbatim

e1

“web blight (WB) caused in beans by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–138 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soilborne sclerotia and colonized debris spread by splashing rain were the main sources of inoculum for WB in these fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–387 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

mulching · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.