Paper · 1988 · Soil Science

EFFECT OF DEEP TILLAGE AND MICROTOPOGRAPHY ON CORN YIELD ON RECLAIMED SURFACE-MINED LANDS1,2

HAROLD M. VAN ES; MICHAEL L. THOMPSON; STANLEY J. HENNING; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this research was to investigate the effects of three methods of deep tillage of compacted reclaimed mine soil on corn (Zea mays L.). Moldboard plowing (0.5-m depth), slip-plowing (0.7-and 1.0-m depths), and subsoiling (0.7− and 1.0-m depths) on test plots were compared with a no-deep-tillage check treatment. During the 1982 growing season, no significant differences in corn yield among the tillage treatments were observed. Instead, corn yields were strongly associated with the microtopography of harvest plots. Yields were reduced in concave positions where standing water had collected during critical periods of the growing season. The spatial variability of corn yields at the experimental site was characterized by geostatistical techniques. The weak expression of tillage-induced drift in the semivariograms that were constructed for different parts of the research area confirmed that tillage treatment effects on corn yield were insignificant. The semivariograms also revealed that spatial variability patterns of yield greatly varied for different regions of the site. An isarithmie corn yield map produced by kriging graphically illustrated the effect of microtopography on yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield did not differ significantly among deep tillage treatments.

Treatment
tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
1982 growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the 1982 growing season, no significant differences in corn yield among the tillage treatments were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–444 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was strongly associated with harvest-plot microtopography.

Outcome
corn yieldse0
Setting
microtopography of harvest plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yields were strongly associated with the microtopography of harvest plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–533 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields were reduced in concave positions where water accumulated during critical growing periods.

Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
standing water had collected during critical periods of the growing seasone0
Setting
concave positionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were reduced in concave positions where standing water had collected during critical periods of the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
t1

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Semivariograms confirmed negligible tillage effects on corn yield.

Outcome
tillage treatment effects on corn yielde0
Direction
insignificante0
Comparator
different parts of the research areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weak expression of tillage-induced drift in the semivariograms that were constructed for different parts of the research area confirmed that tillage treatment effects on corn yield were insignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
t1

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn-yield spatial variability patterns differed substantially among site regions.

Outcome
spatial variability patterns of yielde0
Setting
different regions of the sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spatial variability patterns of yield greatly varied for different regions of the site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
t1

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A kriged corn-yield map illustrated the microtopographic yield effect.

Outcome
effect of microtopography on yielde0
Comparator
microtopographye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An isarithmie corn yield map produced by kriging graphically illustrated the effect of microtopography on yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1212 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.