Paper · 1977 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Use in Winter Wheat in Response to Systematic Pesticides1

Joseph L. Moyer; Gary M. Paulsen

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Various pesticides exhibit plant growth regulating activity and have increased crop yields or altered concentrations of various constituents. Our purpose was to test the effect of commercially available pesticides on winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) with regard to N use, protein concentration, and dry matter production. Growth chamber‐grown wheat seedlings were supplied 2.5 or 10.0 m M nitrate‐N concentrations in nutrient solutions at each of two temperature regimes. Pesticides added to different pots were 0.5 m M concentrations of simazine [2‐chloro‐4, 6‐bis (ethylamino)‐S‐triazine] or dyrene [2,4‐dichloro‐6‐(0‐chloroanilo‐s‐triazine], and 25 m M concentrations of disulfoton [0, 0‐diethyl S‐(2‐(ethylthio) ethyl) phosphorodithioate] or guthion [0, 0‐dimethyl S‐(4‐oxo‐1,2,3‐benzotriazin‐3 (4H)‐ylmethyl phosphorodithioate]. Simazine increased nitrate reductase activity and nitrate concentration, and decreased glutamine synthetase activity. The same four materials were sprayed on field plots at 0.1 or 1.1 kg/ha at one of four growth stages. No autumn treatment affected yield or protein content of forage. Lower simazine rates applied at anthesis and higher simazine rates applied at all three spring growth stages decreased grain yields. Simazine treatments that decreased grain yields, and guthion applied during autumn increased grain protein concentration. The other treatments had no effect on protein or yield. Simazine applied during anthesis decreased grain test weights significantly. Decreased grain yields and increased grain protein concentrations probably resulted from detrimental effects of simazine on photosynthate accumulation and absence of a direct effect on N assimilation when foliar‐applied. Decreased grain test weights apparently resulted from floret sterility and undeveloped grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine increased wheat nitrate reductase activity.

Treatment
Simazinee0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simazine increased nitrate reductase activity and nitrate concentration, and decreased glutamine synthetase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine increased wheat nitrate concentration.

Treatment
Simazinee0
Outcome
nitrate concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simazine increased nitrate reductase activity and nitrate concentration, and decreased glutamine synthetase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine decreased wheat glutamine synthetase activity.

Treatment
Simazinee0
Outcome
glutamine synthetase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simazine increased nitrate reductase activity and nitrate concentration, and decreased glutamine synthetase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn pesticide treatments did not affect wheat forage yield or protein content.

Treatment
autumn treatmente0
Outcome
yield or protein content of foragee0
Direction
No autumn treatment affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“No autumn treatment affected yield or protein content of forage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower simazine rates applied at anthesis decreased wheat grain yields.

Treatment
Lower simazine rates applied at anthesise0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lower simazine rates applied at anthesis and higher simazine rates applied at all three spring growth stages decreased grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher simazine rates at all three spring stages decreased wheat grain yields.

Treatment
higher simazine rates applied at all three spring growth stagese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lower simazine rates applied at anthesis and higher simazine rates applied at all three spring growth stages decreased grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine treatments that reduced grain yield increased wheat grain protein concentration.

Treatment
Simazine treatments that decreased grain yieldse0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simazine treatments that decreased grain yields, and guthion applied during autumn increased grain protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guthion applied in autumn increased wheat grain protein concentration.

Treatment
guthion applied during autumne0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simazine treatments that decreased grain yields, and guthion applied during autumn increased grain protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other pesticide treatments had no effect on wheat protein or yield.

Treatment
other treatmentse0
Outcome
protein or yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The other treatments had no effect on protein or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine at anthesis significantly decreased wheat grain test weights.

Treatment
Simazine applied during anthesise0
Outcome
grain test weightse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simazine applied during anthesis decreased grain test weights significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1519 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute lower grain yield and higher protein concentration to detrimental photosynthate accumulation effects of simazine and no direct foliar effect on nitrogen assimilation.

Treatment
simazinee0
Outcome
Decreased grain yields and increased grain protein concentrationse0
Qualifier
detrimental effects of simazine on photosynthate accumulation and absence of a direct effect on N assimilatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Decreased grain yields and increased grain protein concentrations probably resulted from detrimental effects of simazine on photosynthate accumulation and absence of a direct effect on N assimilation when foliar‐applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1740 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute decreased wheat grain test weight to floret sterility and undeveloped grains.

Outcome
Decreased grain test weightse0
Qualifier
floret sterility and undeveloped grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Decreased grain test weights apparently resulted from floret sterility and undeveloped grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1835 · show in text ↑

simazine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.