Paper · 2008 · Plant Pathology

Differential activation and suppression of potato defence responses by Phytophthora infestans isolates representing US‐1 and US‐8 genotypes

X. Wang; A. El Hadrami; L. R. Adam; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars with different levels of resistance to late blight, Russet Burbank (susceptible) and Kennebec (moderately resistant), after inoculation with single isolates representing Phytophthora infestans genotypes US‐1 (previously predominant, mildly aggressive) and US‐8 (currently predominant, highly aggressive). The accumulation of brown lignin‐like materials and an increase in the cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation were observed in cv. Kennebec inoculated with US‐1, but not in Kennebec inoculated with US‐8, or cv. Russet Burbank inoculated with either US‐1 or US‐8. The expression of PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5 was investigated in three leaf strata (local, proximal and distal) and at different times after inoculation, using SYBR real‐time RT‐PCR. The activation of these defence‐related genes was affected not only by P. infestans genotype, but also by the potato cultivar and the proximity to the inoculation site. These genes were up‐regulated earlier in Kennebec than in Russet Burbank and in response to US‐1 than to US‐8. Over all, the earliest and strongest up‐regulation of these genes occurred in Kennebec inoculated with US‐1. Furthermore, PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 were down‐regulated at the site of infection while such down‐regulation was not observed for PR‐1 or PR‐5 . In parallel, the accumulation level and location of phenolics and rishitin matched those of PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 transcripts, respectively. These results strongly suggest that changes in either the activation or suppression of defence responses by the pathogen shape the level of susceptibility of potato cultivars to late blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kennebec, US‐1 inoculation led to accumulation of brown lignin‐like materials 24 h after inoculation, not seen with US‐8 or in Russet Burbank.

Material
Kennebece0
Treatment
inoculated with US‐1e0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse6pathogen
Outcome
accumulation of brown lignin‐like materialse0
Comparator
Kennebec inoculated with US‐8e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of brown lignin‐like materials and an increase in the cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation were observed in cv. Kennebec inoculated with US‐1, but not in Kennebec inoculated with US‐8, or cv. Russet Burbank inoculated with either US‐1 or US‐8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–644 · show in text ↑
e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e6

“inoculation with single isolates representing Phytophthora infestans genotypes US‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kennebec, US‐1 inoculation increased cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation, not seen with US‐8.

Material
Kennebece0
Treatment
inoculated with US‐1e0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse6pathogen
Outcome
cell wall affinity to trypan bluee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Kennebec inoculated with US‐8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of brown lignin‐like materials and an increase in the cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation were observed in cv. Kennebec inoculated with US‐1, but not in Kennebec inoculated with US‐8, or cv. Russet Burbank inoculated with either US‐1 or US‐8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–644 · show in text ↑
e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e6

“inoculation with single isolates representing Phytophthora infestans genotypes US‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–267 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5 were up‐regulated earlier in Kennebec than in Russet Burbank.

Material
Kennebece2
Gene
PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5e7
Outcome
expressione7
Direction
up‐regulatede2
Comparator
Russet Burbanke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“These genes were up‐regulated earlier in Kennebec than in Russet Burbank and in response to US‐1 than to US‐8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1108 · show in text ↑
e7

“The expression of PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5 was investigated in three leaf strata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The defence-related genes were up‐regulated earlier in response to US‐1 than to US‐8.

Treatment
US‐1e2
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse6pathogen
Gene
PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5e7
Outcome
expressione7
Direction
up‐regulatede2
Comparator
US‐8e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“These genes were up‐regulated earlier in Kennebec than in Russet Burbank and in response to US‐1 than to US‐8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1108 · show in text ↑
e7

“The expression of PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5 was investigated in three leaf strata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–729 · show in text ↑
e6

“inoculation with single isolates representing Phytophthora infestans genotypes US‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earliest and strongest up‐regulation of the defence-related genes occurred in Kennebec inoculated with US‐1.

Material
Kennebece3
Treatment
inoculated with US‐1e3
Gene
PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5e7
Outcome
up‐regulatione3
Direction
strongeste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over all, the earliest and strongest up‐regulation of these genes occurred in Kennebec inoculated with US‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1217 · show in text ↑
e7

“The expression of PAL‐1, HMG‐2, PR‐1 and PR‐5 was investigated in three leaf strata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 were down-regulated at the site of infection.

Organ / stage
site of infectione4
Gene
PAL‐1 and HMG‐2e4
Outcome
down‐regulatede4
Direction
down‐regulatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 were down‐regulated at the site of infection while such down‐regulation was not observed for PR‐1 or PR‐5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Down-regulation was not observed for PR‐1 or PR‐5 at the site of infection.

Organ / stage
site of infectione4
Gene
PR‐1 or PR‐5e4
Outcome
down‐regulatione4
Direction
was not observede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 were down‐regulated at the site of infection while such down‐regulation was not observed for PR‐1 or PR‐5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1353 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolics and rishitin accumulation matched the locations of PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 transcripts in potato.

Gene
PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 transcriptse5
Outcome
accumulation level and location of phenolics and rishitine5
Direction
matchede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“the accumulation level and location of phenolics and rishitin matched those of PAL‐1 and HMG‐2 transcripts, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1489 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: expression · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Mock inoculation with MgCl2 induced higher Pth-St1 mRNA levels.

    Pseudothionin‐St1, a potato peptide active against potato pathogens · 1994 · compared with Infection of leaves with a bacterial pathogen suspended in 10 mM MgCl2

    Same direction

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 24 positive, 16 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.