Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In Kennebec, US‐1 inoculation increased cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation, not seen with US‐8.

A claim from Differential activation and suppression of potato defence responses by Phytophthora infestans isolates representing US‐1 and US‐8 genotypes · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kennebec, US‐1 inoculation increased cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation, not seen with US‐8.

Material
Kennebece0
Treatment
inoculated with US‐1e0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse6pathogen
Outcome
cell wall affinity to trypan bluee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Kennebec inoculated with US‐8e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of brown lignin‐like materials and an increase in the cell wall affinity to trypan blue 24 h after inoculation were observed in cv. Kennebec inoculated with US‐1, but not in Kennebec inoculated with US‐8, or cv. Russet Burbank inoculated with either US‐1 or US‐8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–644
e1

“Defence responses were investigated in two potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59
e6

“inoculation with single isolates representing Phytophthora infestans genotypes US‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–267

Title

Differential activation and suppression of potato defence responses by Phytophthora infestans isolates representing US‐1 and US‐8 genotypes

X. Wang; A. El Hadrami; L. R. Adam; et al. Plant Pathology 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01866.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e8c72c87e898dba6b84446073244888fdbba11214f0f0b60b0a9683af1496afe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 24 positive, 16 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.