Paper · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Amylase Activity in Taproots of Medicago sativa L. andLotus corniculatusL. Following Defoliation

P. J. BOYCE; E. PENALOZA; J. J. VOLENEC

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Although the patterns of starch metabolism in taproots of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) have been characterized, little is known regarding the activities of starch-degrading enzymes in taproots of these species. Our objective was to determine how defoliation influences starch degradation and activities of amylases in taproots of alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil. In Exp. 1, amylolytic activities and starch concentrations in taproots of defoliated and undefoliated plants were compared on days 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14 after defoliation. Taproot starch concentrations declined in defoliated plants, while increasing in taproots of undefoliated plants. Exoamylase activities in taproots of defoliated plants did not change with defoliation, while endoamylase activities increased 2-fold in defoliated alfalfa and 50% in defoliated birdsfoot trefoil plants when compared to undefoliated plants. In Exp. 2, activity and isoform complement of amylases were monitored during seedling development. High endoamylase activity was found in taproots of both species at all samplings. In contrast, exoamylase accumulated in taproots of alfalfa, but not birdsfoot trefoil, in a pattern similar to starch accumulation. As in Exp. 1, defoliation increased endoamylase, but not exoamylase activity in taproots of both species. Taproots of both species contained one major and two minor endoamylase isoforms, but the electrophoretic mobility of these isoforms differed between species. Activities of all isoforms, as indicated on starch-gel blots, increased in response to defoliation. These results indicate that defoliation increases activity of taproot endoamylases, whose activity is associated with taproot starch degradation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation reduced taproot starch in both species.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
defoliated plantse0
Outcome
Taproot starch concentrationse0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
undefoliated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taproot starch concentrations declined in defoliated plants, while increasing in taproots of undefoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undefoliated plants increased taproot starch over time.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoile1
Treatment
undefoliated plantse0
Outcome
taproot starch concentrationse0
Direction
increasinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Taproot starch concentrations declined in defoliated plants, while increasing in taproots of undefoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not change taproot exoamylase activity.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
Exoamylase activitiese0
Direction
did not changee0
Comparator
undefoliated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exoamylase activities in taproots of defoliated plants did not change with defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“Taproot starch concentrations declined in defoliated plants, while increasing in taproots of undefoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation increased alfalfa taproot endoamylase activity twofold.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
defoliated alfalfae0
Outcome
endoamylase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2-folde0
Comparator
undefoliated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“endoamylase activities increased 2-fold in defoliated alfalfa and 50% in defoliated birdsfoot trefoil plants when compared to undefoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation increased birdsfoot trefoil taproot endoamylase activity 50%.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoile0
Treatment
defoliated birdsfoot trefoil plantse0
Outcome
endoamylase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
undefoliated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“endoamylase activities increased 2-fold in defoliated alfalfa and 50% in defoliated birdsfoot trefoil plants when compared to undefoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species had high taproot endoamylase activity at all samplings.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
taprootse0
Outcome
High endoamylase activitye0
Qualifier
at all samplingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High endoamylase activity was found in taproots of both species at all samplings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exoamylase accumulated in alfalfa taproots in a pattern like starch accumulation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
taprootse0
Outcome
exoamylase accumulatede0
Direction
accumulatede0
Qualifier
pattern similar to starch accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exoamylase accumulated in taproots of alfalfa, but not birdsfoot trefoil, in a pattern similar to starch accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exoamylase did not accumulate in birdsfoot trefoil taproots.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoile0
Organ / stage
taprootse0
Outcome
not birdsfoot trefoile0

Verbatim

e0

“exoamylase accumulated in taproots of alfalfa, but not birdsfoot trefoil, in a pattern similar to starch accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species had one major and two minor taproot endoamylase isoforms.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
Taprootse0
Outcome
one major and two minor endoamylase isoformse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taproots of both species contained one major and two minor endoamylase isoforms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endoamylase isoform mobility differed between the species.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
electrophoretic mobility of these isoforms differed between speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the electrophoretic mobility of these isoforms differed between species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation increased all endoamylase isoform activities.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
Activities of all isoformse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of all isoforms, as indicated on starch-gel blots, increased in response to defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1608 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taproot endoamylase activity was associated with starch degradation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
taproote0
Outcome
taproot starch degradatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“taproot endoamylases, whose activity is associated with taproot starch degradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1754 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–132 · show in text ↑

pruning · physiology: enzyme activity · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.