Paper · 2014 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Drip Fertigation Program on Growth, Crop Productivity, Water, and Fertilizer-Use Efficiency of Bt Cotton in Semi-arid Tropical Region of India

M. Jayakumar; U. Surendran; P. Manickasundaram

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of drip fertigation with biofertilizers on growth, yield, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton. The treatments were comprised of drip fertigation with 75, 100, 125, and 150% of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) combined with and without biofertilizers as biofertigation, soil application of 100% RDF, and control. Growth, yield attributes, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton were significantly influenced by drip fertigation treatments. Application of 150% nitrogen (N)–phosphorus (P)–potassium (K) as drip fertigation combined with biofertigation of liquid formulation of azophosmet at 250 ml (1012 cells ml−1) ha−1 was significantly superior over surface irrigation and soil application of 100% NPK and registered the greatest seed cotton yield of 3395 kg ha−1. The soil fertility status was greater under this treatment when compared to surface irrigation and soil application of fertilizers. It is recommended that drip fertigation of inorganic fertilizers in combination with biofertigation be used as a viable technique to realize the yield potential of Bt cotton and sustenance of soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield attributes of Bt cotton were significantly influenced by drip fertigation treatments in a field experiment.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
drip fertigation treatmentse1
Outcome
Growth, yield attributese1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of drip fertigation with biofertilizers on growth, yield, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth, yield attributes, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton were significantly influenced by drip fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton were significantly influenced by drip fertigation treatments in a field experiment.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
drip fertigation treatmentse1
Outcome
water, and fertilizer-use efficiencye1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of drip fertigation with biofertilizers on growth, yield, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth, yield attributes, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton were significantly influenced by drip fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation of 150% NPK combined with biofertigation gave the greatest seed cotton yield of Bt cotton (3395 kg ha−1), significantly superior to surface irrigation and to 100% NPK soil application.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
drip fertigation combined with biofertigatione2
Outcome
seed cotton yielde2
Direction
greateste2
Value
3395 kg ha−1e2
Comparator
surface irrigation and soil application of 100% NPKe2
Setting
field experimente0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of drip fertigation with biofertilizers on growth, yield, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 150% nitrogen (N)–phosphorus (P)–potassium (K) as drip fertigation combined with biofertigation of liquid formulation of azophosmet at 250 ml (1012 cells ml−1) ha−1 was significantly superior over surface irrigation and soil application of 100% NPK and registered the greatest seed cotton yield of 3395 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation combined with biofertigation increased soil fertility status compared with surface irrigation and soil application of fertilizers.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
drip fertigation combined with biofertigatione2
Outcome
soil fertility statuse3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
surface irrigation and soil application of fertilizerse3
Setting
field experimente0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of drip fertigation with biofertilizers on growth, yield, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 150% nitrogen (N)–phosphorus (P)–potassium (K) as drip fertigation combined with biofertigation of liquid formulation of azophosmet at 250 ml (1012 cells ml−1) ha−1 was significantly superior over surface irrigation and soil application of 100% NPK and registered the greatest seed cotton yield of 3395 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–849 · show in text ↑
e3

“The soil fertility status was greater under this treatment when compared to surface irrigation and soil application of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–981 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation of inorganic fertilizers combined with biofertigation is recommended as a viable technique to realize the yield potential of Bt cotton.

Taxon
Bt cottone4
Treatment
drip fertigation of inorganic fertilizers in combination with biofertigatione4
Outcome
yield potentiale4

Verbatim

e4

“It is recommended that drip fertigation of inorganic fertilizers in combination with biofertigation be used as a viable technique to realize the yield potential of Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1156 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.