Paper · 2013 · Plant Disease

Triazole Sensitivity in a Contemporary Population of Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat and Competitiveness of a Tebuconazole-Resistant Isolate

Pierri Spolti; Emerson M. Del Ponte; Yanhong Dong; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
123
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A sample of 50 isolates, including 25 each of the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol and the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol trichothecene genotype, from a contemporary collection of Fusarium graminearum associated with Fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat in New York varied in sensitivity to tebuconazole (effective concentration leading to a 50% reduction of mycelial growth [EC 50 ] of 0.28 to 8.09 mg/liter; μ = 1.12 mg/liter) and metconazole (0.05 to 0.86 mg/liter; μ = 0.33). Mean sensitivity did not differ between the trichothecene genotype groups. Isolate Gz448NY11 from Steuben County is the first tebuconazole-resistant field isolate of F. graminearum reported in the Americas and has the lowest sensitivity to tebuconazole (EC 50 = 8.09 mg/liter) documented for this species. Suppression of FHB and deoxynivalenol (DON) following application of a commercial rate of tebuconazole was significantly diminished in plants inoculated with the tebuconazole-resistant isolate compared with those inoculated with a tebuconazole-sensitive isolate well documented for its aggressiveness and toxigenicity on wheat. There was no diminution of FHB and DON suppression with either isolate following application of metconazole. Significantly more individuals of the tebuconazole-resistant isolate were recovered from spikes inoculated with an equal mixture of the two isolates and sprayed with tebuconazole. Future studies are needed on the epidemiology and monitoring of triazole-resistant isolates to understand the risk that fungicide resistance poses to disease management and food security.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium graminearum isolates from New York wheat varied in tebuconazole sensitivity, with EC50 values of 0.28 to 8.09 mg/liter.

Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
sensitivity to tebuconazolee1
Value
0.28 to 8.09 mg/litere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“varied in sensitivity to tebuconazole (effective concentration leading to a 50% reduction of mycelial growth [EC 50 ] of 0.28 to 8.09 mg/liter; μ = 1.12 mg/liter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate Gz448NY11 from Steuben County is the first tebuconazole-resistant field isolate of F. graminearum reported in the Americas.

Material
Gz448NY11e2
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume2pathogen
Outcome
first tebuconazole-resistant field isolatee2
Setting
Steuben Countye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Isolate Gz448NY11 from Steuben County is the first tebuconazole-resistant field isolate of F. graminearum reported in the Americas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate Gz448NY11 has the lowest tebuconazole sensitivity documented for F. graminearum, with EC50 of 8.09 mg/liter.

Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
sensitivity to tebuconazolee3
Value
8.09 mg/litere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“has the lowest sensitivity to tebuconazole (EC 50 = 8.09 mg/liter) documented for this species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean tebuconazole sensitivity did not differ between the trichothecene genotype groups.

Outcome
Mean sensitivitye4
Comparator
trichothecene genotype groupse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Mean sensitivity did not differ between the trichothecene genotype groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FHB and DON suppression by a commercial rate of tebuconazole was significantly diminished in plants inoculated with the resistant isolate compared with the sensitive isolate.

Treatment
application of a commercial rate of tebuconazolee5
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
Suppression of FHB and deoxynivalenol (DON)e5
Direction
significantly diminishede5
Comparator
a tebuconazole-sensitive isolatee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Suppression of FHB and deoxynivalenol (DON) following application of a commercial rate of tebuconazole was significantly diminished in plants inoculated with the tebuconazole-resistant isolate compared with those inoculated with a tebuconazole-sensitive isolate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No diminution of FHB and DON suppression occurred with either isolate after metconazole application.

Treatment
application of metconazolee6
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
FHB and DON suppressione6
Direction
no diminutione6
Comparator
either isolatee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“There was no diminution of FHB and DON suppression with either isolate following application of metconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tebuconazole-resistant isolate was recovered significantly more often than the sensitive isolate from mixed inoculated spikes sprayed with tebuconazole.

Treatment
sprayed with tebuconazolee7
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
individuals of the tebuconazole-resistant isolatee7
Direction
Significantly moree7
Comparator
an equal mixture of the two isolatese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Significantly more individuals of the tebuconazole-resistant isolate were recovered from spikes inoculated with an equal mixture of the two isolates and sprayed with tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum from New York Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

metconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.