Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Yield Response And Nitrogen Use Efficiency Of Wheat Under Different Doses And Split Application Of Nitrogen Fertilizer

M Ataur Rahman; MAZ Sarker; MF Amin; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the central research farm of Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur for two consecutive years to verify the yield response of wheat variety Prodip to different doses and split applications of N fertilizer to determine appropriate N dose and application method for increasing NUE and grain yield of wheat. The treatments comprised of 12 combinations of three doses of nitrogen (80, 100, and 120 kg/ha) from urea, which were assigned in the main plots and four methods of N splitting viz., application of all N as basal; 2/3rd basal plus 1/3rd as top dress at crown root initiation (CR1) stage; 1/2 basal plus 1/2 as top dress at CR1 stage; and 1/3rd basal with 1/3rd as top dress at CR1 plus 1/3rd as top dress at 1st node stage which were tested in the sub plots. Higher yield was achieved from N rate of 120 kgiha applied as three equal splits of one-third as basal during final land preparation, one-third as top dressing during CR1 and the rest one-third top dressing at first node stage. The yield advantage of wheat due to N treatments was attributed to higher thousand grain weight and spikes/m2. Nitrogen content in wheat grain and straw was not affected significantly by different N treatment and their combinations, whereas plant N uptake was significantly influenced by N rate and N splitting and also due to the interaction of N rate and N splitting. Total N uptake was maximum under N rate of 120 kg/ha applied as three equal splits as 1/3rd basal with 1/3rd as top dress at CR1 plus 1/3rd as top dress at 1st node stage. Split applications of sub-optimal dose of N (80 kg/ha) resulted in negative gain in apparent NUE, but split applications, especially three split applications (1/3rd basal, 1/3rd at CR1, and 1/3rd at 1st node stage) of higher dose of N (100 and 120 kg/ha) resulted in positive gain in apparent NUE. Keywords: Wheat grain yield; nitrogen management; N uptake and NUE DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v36i2.9249 BJAR 2011; 36(2): 231-240

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wheat yield came from 120 kgiha nitrogen in three equal splits.

Treatment
N rate of 120 kgiha applied as three equal splitse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yield was achieved from N rate of 120 kgiha applied as three equal splits of one-third as basal during final land preparation, one-third as top dressing during CR1 and the rest one-third top dressing at first node stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher thousand grain weight contributed to the wheat yield advantage under nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield advantage of wheat due to N treatments was attributed to higher thousand grain weight and spikes/m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher spikes per square metre contributed to the wheat yield advantage under nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
spikes/m2e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield advantage of wheat due to N treatments was attributed to higher thousand grain weight and spikes/m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain nitrogen content did not significantly change across nitrogen treatments.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
different N treatment and their combinationse0
Outcome
Nitrogen content in wheat graine0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen content in wheat grain and straw was not affected significantly by different N treatment and their combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw nitrogen content did not significantly change across nitrogen treatments.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
different N treatment and their combinationse0
Outcome
Nitrogen content in wheat grain and strawe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen content in wheat grain and straw was not affected significantly by different N treatment and their combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nitrogen uptake was significantly affected by nitrogen rate, splitting and their interaction.

Treatment
N rate and N splittinge0
Outcome
plant N uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant N uptake was significantly influenced by N rate and N splitting and also due to the interaction of N rate and N splitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen uptake was greatest at 120 kg/ha nitrogen in three equal splits.

Treatment
N rate of 120 kg/ha applied as three equal splitse0
Outcome
Total N uptakee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N uptake was maximum under N rate of 120 kg/ha applied as three equal splits as 1/3rd basal with 1/3rd as top dress at CR1 plus 1/3rd as top dress at 1st node stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting 80 kg/ha nitrogen produced a negative gain in apparent NUE.

Treatment
Split applications of sub-optimal dose of N (80 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
apparent NUEe0
Direction
negative gaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split applications of sub-optimal dose of N (80 kg/ha) resulted in negative gain in apparent NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting 100 kg/ha nitrogen produced a positive gain in apparent NUE.

Treatment
100e0
Outcome
apparent NUEe0
Direction
positive gaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“split applications, especially three split applications (1/3rd basal, 1/3rd at CR1, and 1/3rd at 1st node stage) of higher dose of N (100 and 120 kg/ha) resulted in positive gain in apparent NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting 120 kg/ha nitrogen produced a positive gain in apparent NUE.

Treatment
120 kg/hae0
Outcome
apparent NUEe0
Direction
positive gaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“split applications, especially three split applications (1/3rd basal, 1/3rd at CR1, and 1/3rd at 1st node stage) of higher dose of N (100 and 120 kg/ha) resulted in positive gain in apparent NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.