Paper · 1953 · Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research

FACTORS AFFECTING THE GROWTH AND FORM OF YOUNG BEECH AT GARDINER FOREST, WILTSHIRE

A. D. MILLER

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The record of an intensive study of young beech (<it>Fagus sylvatica</it> L.) which had been introduced by planting into an area of old hazel (<it>Corylus avellana</it> L.) in 1946 using different sizes of strips and groups. One object was to find out which of the environmental factors, e.g. soil, root competition, light intensity, frost, wind, and humidity, were responsible for the very marked differences in growth. The same beech were also classified according to their form and their tendency to fork. The conclusions reached are enumerated at the end of the paper. Among the more important are that, up to this stage at any rate, the depth of soil over the chalk has no effect on growth; root competition with dense hazel is not injurious; even quite appreciable reductions in light intensities have no ill effect; hazel hedges provide considerable shelter from wind, which is likely to be of value where water is scarce, and the number of forks is closely related to leading shoot damage of which Lammas shoots are an important source.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil depth over chalk had no effect on young beech growth at this stage.

Taxon
beecht0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no effecte0
Setting
chalke0

Verbatim

e0

“the depth of soil over the chalk has no effect on growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“YOUNG BEECH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root competition with dense hazel was not injurious to beech.

Taxon
beecht0
Interactor
hazele0other
Outcome
not injuriouse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“root competition with dense hazel is not injurious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“YOUNG BEECH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appreciable reductions in light intensity had no ill effect on beech.

Taxon
beecht0
Treatment
reductions in light intensitiese0
Outcome
ill effecte0
Direction
no ill effecte0

Verbatim

e0

“even quite appreciable reductions in light intensities have no ill effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“YOUNG BEECH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hazel hedges sheltered beech from wind.

Taxon
beecht0
Interactor
hazele0other
Outcome
considerable shelter from winde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“hazel hedges provide considerable shelter from wind”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“YOUNG BEECH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beech fork number was closely related to leading shoot damage.

Taxon
beecht0
Organ / stage
leading shoote0
Outcome
number of forkse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the number of forks is closely related to leading shoot damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“YOUNG BEECH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lammas shoots were an important source of leading shoot damage.

Taxon
beecht0
Organ / stage
Lammas shootse0
Outcome
leading shoot damagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“leading shoot damage of which Lammas shoots are an important source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“YOUNG BEECH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52 · show in text ↑