Paper · 2010 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Effect of sowing date on the weed infestation of winter wheat a in long-term experiment

P. Bónis; F. Balázs; J. Balázs; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Detailed coenological studies were made at four developmental stages during the vegetation period in three sowing date variants in a long-term multifactorial experiment carried out in the Crop Production Institute of Pannon University. Both experimental years had poor rainfall supplies. The Balázs-Ujvárosi scoring method was used to register the extent of weed infestation and how it changed over the vegetation period. Both the wheat grain yield and the level of weed infestation were greatly influenced by the sowing date. Averaged over the two years, the largest volume of weeds was recorded in March. After the wheat started shooting, the weeds were suppressed. The three sowing dates had the greatest effect on weed growth from the stage of initial development to shooting. After late sowing, the smallest number of weeds was observed during this period in both years. By the time the crop matured the level of weed infestation had changed, with the largest number of weeds in the late-sown variant, where the wheat did not form a closed canopy. Averaged over all samplings in both years, the following five species had the highest abundance: Stellaria media (4.86%), Veronica hederifolia (3.38%), Papaver rhoeas (1.97%), Capsella bursa pastoris (1.41%), Matricaria maritima (0.96%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date greatly influenced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
sowing datee0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the wheat grain yield and the level of weed infestation were greatly influenced by the sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–526 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date greatly influenced weed infestation.

Treatment
sowing datee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
level of weed infestatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the wheat grain yield and the level of weed infestation were greatly influenced by the sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed volume was largest in March across two years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
volume of weedse0
Direction
largeste0
Setting
Marche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Averaged over the two years, the largest volume of weeds was recorded in March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds were suppressed after wheat shooting began.

Organ / stage
shootinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
suppressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the wheat started shooting, the weeds were suppressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–667 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of sowing dates on weed growth was greatest from initial development to shooting.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
three sowing datese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
stage of initial development to shootinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three sowing dates had the greatest effect on weed growth from the stage of initial development to shooting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing produced the smallest weed number before shooting in both years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
late sowinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
smalleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After late sowing, the smallest number of weeds was observed during this period in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At crop maturity, late sowing had the largest weed number and wheat lacked a closed canopy.

Treatment
late-sown variante0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
largeste0
Qualifier
wheat did not form a closed canopye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By the time the crop matured the level of weed infestation had changed, with the largest number of weeds in the late-sown variant, where the wheat did not form a closed canopy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellaria media had the highest reported abundance at 4.86%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Stellaria mediaStellaria mediae0weed
Outcome
Stellaria mediae0
Value
4.86%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stellaria media
Stellaria media · Interactorfr:Utilisateur:Jeantosti · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stellaria media (4.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veronica hederifolia abundance was 3.38%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Veronica hederifoliaVeronica hederifoliae0weed
Outcome
Veronica hederifoliae0
Value
3.38%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Veronica hederifolia
Veronica hederifolia · InteractorKaldari · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veronica hederifolia (3.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver rhoeas abundance was 1.97%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Papaver rhoeasPapaver rhoease0weed
Outcome
Papaver rhoease0
Value
1.97%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Papaver rhoeas
Papaver rhoeas · InteractorJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver rhoeas (1.97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsella bursa pastoris abundance was 1.41%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Capsella bursa pastorise0weed
Outcome
Capsella bursa pastorise0
Value
1.41%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsella bursa pastoris (1.41%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matricaria maritima abundance was 0.96%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Matricaria maritimaTripleurospermum maritimume0weed
Outcome
Matricaria maritimae0
Value
0.96%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tripleurospermum maritimum
Tripleurospermum maritimum · InteractorUser:Jamesnbryant · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Matricaria maritima (0.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑

sowing time · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.