sowing time · Weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)
12 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 4
Influence of temperate grass seed rotation systems on weed seed soil bank composition · 2002
- positive
Effect of sowing date on the weed infestation of winter wheat a in long-term experiment · 2010
- positive
- negative
The influence of crop density and sowing delay on weed germination in winter wheat · 2018
- positive
Weed management in wheat under different sowing windows in new alluvial zone of West Bengal, India · 2025
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 6
Effect of Sowing Date and Weed Control on Grain Yield and its Components in Some Wheat Cultivars · 1986
- no effect
- negative
Crop competitiveness influenced by seeding dates and top-dress nitrogen rates. · 2008
- negative
- negative
- negative
Effects of sowing dates and mulching on growth and yield of wheat and weeds (Phalaris minor Retz.) · 2019
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.