Paper · 2008 · PubMed

Crop competitiveness influenced by seeding dates and top-dress nitrogen rates.

L Fodor; E Lehoczky; E Fodorne Fehér; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A competitive crop utilizes resources before they are available to the weeds. The essential steps of developing a competitive crop begin with good stand establishment. A vigorously growing crop is also important towards establishing a competitive stand. Components of establishing a good and vigorous crop stand include crop rotation, seedbed preparation, crop type and variety selection, seed quality and treatment, seeding rate (stand density), seeding date, fertilizer rate and placement, pest and disease control, etc. Failure to properly manage these components leads to poor germination, week seedlings with poor grows and vigor therefore promotes weed competition with the crop. Biomass production and density of weeds and winter wheat plants was studied in a seeding time and nitrogen application small-plot field trial. This trial was a perfect example of how the proper management practices help us to decrease weediness and increase competition of winter wheat. The trial included 3 planting date treatments (early, optimum and late) and 2 nitrogen rate treatments (56 kg N ha-1 and 110 kg N ha-1) in spring top-dressing application. The influence of treatments on the weed infestation and crop plant vs. weed competition was studied at beginning of steam extension (BBCH 32-33, two visible nodes on the steam) and after harvest on the stubble-field. The competitiveness of weeds and crop plants were evaluated by biomass production and also by nutrient content of plant samples. Biomass forming of weeds in wheat canopy was negligible compared to that of weeds, but it was strong on the stubble. Delayed planting Leaded to poorer wheat growth and better weed biomass production. The higher rate of nitrogen resuited in a less weediness on early and optimum time seeded plots, but the tendency was opposite in the late seeded treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed biomass in the wheat canopy was negligible but strong in stubble.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
Biomass forming of weedse0
Setting
wheat canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass forming of weeds in wheat canopy was negligible compared to that of weeds, but it was strong on the stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop competitiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting led to poorer wheat growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
poorere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed planting Leaded to poorer wheat growth and better weed biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting increased weed biomass production.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Delayed plantinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass productione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed planting Leaded to poorer wheat growth and better weed biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher nitrogen rate reduced weediness in early and optimum seeded plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
higher rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
weedinesse0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
early and optimum time seeded plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher rate of nitrogen resuited in a less weediness on early and optimum time seeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1786 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher nitrogen rate had the opposite weediness tendency in late seeded plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
higher rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
weedinesse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Qualifier
late seeded treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher rate of nitrogen resuited in a less weediness on early and optimum time seeded plots, but the tendency was opposite in the late seeded treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1846 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 · show in text ↑

sowing time · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sowing time · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.