Paper · 1999 · Grass and Forage Science

Dry‐matter yield and herbage quality of a perennial ryegrass/white clover sward in a rotational grazing and cutting system

Schils; Vellinga; Kraak

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The expected reduction in the use of fertilizer nitrogen (N) on grassland in the Netherlands has led to renewed interest in white clover. Therefore, the performance of a newly sown perennial ryegrass/white clover sward on clay soil was assessed during 4 consecutive years. The experiment consisted of all combinations of two defoliation systems, i.e. one or two silage cuts per year (S1, S2), spring N application rate, i.e. 0 or 50 kg ha −1 year −1 (N 0 , N 50 ), and the management system, i.e. rotational grazing and cutting, or cutting only (RGC, CO). The overall mean white clover cover was 30%. All treatments affected white clover cover, which was 8% higher with S2 than with S1, 6% higher with N 0 than with N 50 and 12% higher with CO than with RGC. The overall mean annual dry‐matter (DM) yield (13·1 t ha −1 year −1 ) was significantly affected only by the management system: in two relatively wetter years, the annual DM yield was 1·19 t ha −1 higher with RGC than with CO, whereas there was no difference in two relatively drier years. Nitrogen application increased the DM yield in the first cut by 7·0 kg kg −1 N applied, but had no significant effect on the annual DM yield. Herbage quality was not affected by the experimental treatments. The average in vitro organic matter digestibility was 0.801, and the average crude protein content was 193 g kg −1 DM. With the expected reduction in the use of fertilizer N, perennial ryegrass/white clover swards should be seriously considered as an alternative option to perennial ryegrass swards on these clay soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean white clover cover was 30%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
white clover covere0
Value
30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall mean white clover cover was 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two silage cuts raised white clover cover by 8% relative to one cut.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
white clover covere0
Direction
highere0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
S1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“white clover cover, which was 8% higher with S2 than with S1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No nitrogen application raised white clover cover by 6% relative to 50 kg nitrogen.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense1
Treatment
N 0e0
Outcome
white clover covere1
Direction
highere0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
N 50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6% higher with N 0 than with N 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The overall mean white clover cover was 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting alone raised white clover cover by 12% relative to rotational grazing and cutting.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense1
Treatment
COe0
Outcome
white clover covere1
Direction
highere0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
RGCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12% higher with CO than with RGC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The overall mean white clover cover was 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–599 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall mean annual dry matter yield was 13·1 t ha −1 year −1.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Outcome
annual dry‐matter (DM) yielde0
Value
13·1 t ha −1 year −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The overall mean annual dry‐matter (DM) yield (13·1 t ha −1 year −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotational grazing and cutting raised annual dry matter yield by 1·19 t ha −1 in wetter years.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Treatment
RGCe0
Outcome
annual DM yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1·19 t ha −1e0
Qualifier
two relatively wetter yearse0
Comparator
COe0

Verbatim

e0

“in two relatively wetter years, the annual DM yield was 1·19 t ha −1 higher with RGC than with CO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotational grazing and cutting did not differ from cutting alone in annual yield during drier years.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Treatment
RGCe1
Outcome
annual DM yielde1
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
two relatively drier yearse0
Comparator
COe1

Verbatim

e0

“there was no difference in two relatively drier years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“in two relatively wetter years, the annual DM yield was 1·19 t ha −1 higher with RGC than with CO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased first-cut yield by 7·0 kg per kg nitrogen applied.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
DM yield in the first cute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7·0 kg kg −1 N appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application increased the DM yield in the first cut by 7·0 kg kg −1 N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application had no significant effect on annual dry matter yield.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
annual DM yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but had no significant effect on the annual DM yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application increased the DM yield in the first cut by 7·0 kg kg −1 N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental treatments did not affect herbage quality.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Treatment
experimental treatmentse0
Outcome
Herbage qualitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage quality was not affected by the experimental treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean digestibility was 0.801.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Outcome
in vitro organic matter digestibilitye0
Value
0.801e0

Verbatim

e0

“The average in vitro organic matter digestibility was 0.801”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean crude protein content was 193 g kg −1 DM.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass/white clover swardt0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Value
193 g kg −1 DMe0

Verbatim

e0

“the average crude protein content was 193 g kg −1 DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“perennial ryegrass/white clover sward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

28 papers: 13 positive, 15 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.