Paper · 1916 · Botanical Gazette

New Dimorphic Mutants of the Oenotheras

Hugo DeVries

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · public-domain

Abstract

1. Besides O. scintillans, which splits under ordinary circumstances in every generation into nearly equal groups of plants of the same type and others of the type of O. Lamarckiana, I have cultivated pedigree families of 4 other mutants of O. Lamarckiana which behave in the same manner. They have been designated as O. cana. O. pallescens, O. Lactuca, and O. liquida. Their Lamarckiana-like offspring are constant in their progeny. Besides the two main types, they produce, as a rule, a relatively high percentage of other mutants. 2. The specimens of the parental type are on the average produced in about 40 per cent, the other 60 per cent being Lamarckiana with some mutants; but these figures vary with the cultures and with the plants according to their individual strength. They may even increase, on very strong biennials, to 93-97 per cent for the parental type. 3. Dimorphic mutants of this type occur also in allied species of the biennis group, as has been discovered by Bartlett in the case of O. stenomeres mut. lasiopetala and described in this article for O. biennis Chicago mut. saligna. 4. In the crosses with older species or with O. Lamarckiana and its derivatives, O. cana follows exactly the type of the analogous crosses of O. scintillans and O. lata. 5. In the dimorphic mutants, the special characters are handed down to the next generation through the ovules only. The pollen lacks these characters, and is, so far as investigated, not different from that of pure O. Lamarckiana. 6. The dimorphic mutants constitute a group in which the hereditary phenomena are evidently independent of the externally visible characters of the special members of the group, but must be assumed to have the same intrinsic causes in the different cases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed public-domain. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four additional Oenothera mutants split into parental and Lamarckiana like types each generation.

Taxon
O. Lamarckianae0
Material
O. canae0
Outcome
4 other mutantse0

Verbatim

e0

“I have cultivated pedigree families of 4 other mutants of O. Lamarckiana which behave in the same manner. They have been designated as O. cana. O. pallescens, O. Lactuca, and O. liquida.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamarckiana like offspring bred true.

Outcome
Lamarckiana-like offspring are constante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Their Lamarckiana-like offspring are constant in their progeny.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dimorphic lines also produced a relatively high proportion of other mutants.

Outcome
other mutantse0
Direction
relatively high percentagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Besides the two main types, they produce, as a rule, a relatively high percentage of other mutants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–533 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental type specimens averaged about 40 per cent.

Outcome
specimens of the parental typee0
Value
40 per cente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The specimens of the parental type are on the average produced in about 40 per cent, the other 60 per cent being Lamarckiana with some mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamarckiana like plants and mutants comprised about 60 per cent.

Taxon
LamarckianaLamarckianae0
Outcome
Lamarckiana with some mutantse0
Value
60 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lamarckiana
Lamarckiana · TaxonBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other 60 per cent being Lamarckiana with some mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong biennials reached 93-97 per cent parental type.

Outcome
parental typee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
93-97 per cente0
Qualifier
very strong biennialse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“They may even increase, on very strong biennials, to 93-97 per cent for the parental type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–872 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimorphic mutants also occur among allied biennis species.

Taxon
O. biennis Chicagoe0
Material
mut. salignae0
Outcome
Dimorphic mutants of this type occure0

Verbatim

e0

“Dimorphic mutants of this type occur also in allied species of the biennis group, as has been discovered by Bartlett in the case of O. stenomeres mut. lasiopetala and described in this article for O. biennis Chicago mut. saligna.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crosses of O. cana followed the pattern of analogous O. scintillans and O. lata crosses.

Taxon
O. canae0
Material
O. canae0
Outcome
follows exactly the type of the analogous crossese0
Comparator
O. scintillans and O. latae0

Verbatim

e0

“In the crosses with older species or with O. Lamarckiana and its derivatives, O. cana follows exactly the type of the analogous crosses of O. scintillans and O. lata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Special mutant characters were transmitted through ovules only.

Organ / stage
ovules onlye0
Outcome
special characters are handed downe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the dimorphic mutants, the special characters are handed down to the next generation through the ovules only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen lacked the special characters.

Taxon
O. Lamarckianae0
Organ / stage
pollene0
Outcome
pollen lacks these characterse0

Verbatim

e0

“The pollen lacks these characters, and is, so far as investigated, not different from that of pure O. Lamarckiana.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Investigated pollen did not differ from pure O. Lamarckiana pollen.

Taxon
O. Lamarckianae0
Outcome
pollene0
Direction
not differente0
Qualifier
so far as investigatede0
Comparator
pure O. Lamarckianae0

Verbatim

e0

“The pollen lacks these characters, and is, so far as investigated, not different from that of pure O. Lamarckiana.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1506 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer shared intrinsic causes independent of visible characters.

Outcome
hereditary phenomenae0
Qualifier
same intrinsic causese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the hereditary phenomena are evidently independent of the externally visible characters of the special members of the group, but must be assumed to have the same intrinsic causes in the different cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1762 · show in text ↑