Paper · 1986 · Physiologia Plantarum

Light‐mediated bioregulation of tillering and photosynthate partitioning in wheat

M. J. Kasperbauer; D. L. Karlen

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
112
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of plant population density on spectral distribution of light received by wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Coker 797) seedlings was measured under field conditions, and effects of red and far‐red light on tillering and photosynthate partitioning were studied in controlled environments. Spectral distribution of light was measured in sunflecks at soil level in close‐, intermediate‐, and wide‐spaced field populations during the tillering stage. Close‐spaced seedlings received higher far‐red/red light ratios than wide‐spaced plants because of the larger amount of far‐red reflected from green leaves of the more numerous nearby plants. The far‐red/red light ratios in all population densities were higher in late afternoon than at noon. Close‐spaced plants developed fewer tillers, less roots and longer leaves than wide‐spaced seedlings under field conditions. In controlled environments, a higher far‐red/red ratio during photosynthetic periods resulted in fewer tillers and longer leaves; whereas, brief red or far‐red exposures at the end of each day had a more pronounced effect. Wheat seedlings that received 5‐min exposures to far‐red light at the end of the photosynthetic period each day for 20 consecutive days developed fewer tillers, longer leaves, less roots, and a higher shoot/root biomass ratio. The effects of far‐red light were reversed by red light. The light spectral shifts associated with field plant population densities and the responses to red and far‐red treatments under controlled environments suggest that phytochrome serves as a sensing mechanism that detects the amount of competition from other plants, and regulates the development of tillers and the partitioning of photosynthate between shoots and roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Close spacing increased far-red/red light ratio relative to wide spacing.

Outcome
far‐red/red light ratiose0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wide‐spaced plantse0
Setting
Close‐spacede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Close‐spaced seedlings received higher far‐red/red light ratios than wide‐spaced plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red/red ratios were higher in late afternoon than at noon.

Outcome
far‐red/red light ratiose0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
at noone0
Setting
late afternoone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The far‐red/red light ratios in all population densities were higher in late afternoon than at noon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Close spacing produced fewer tillers, less roots and longer leaves than wide spacing.

Treatment
Close‐spacede0
Outcome
fewer tillers, less roots and longer leavese0
Comparator
wide‐spaced seedlingse0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Close‐spaced plants developed fewer tillers, less roots and longer leaves than wide‐spaced seedlings under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher far-red/red ratio yielded fewer tillers and longer leaves.

Treatment
higher far‐red/red ratioe0
Outcome
fewer tillers and longer leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher far‐red/red ratio during photosynthetic periods resulted in fewer tillers and longer leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-of-day far-red exposure yielded fewer tillers, longer leaves, less roots and higher shoot/root ratio.

Treatment
5‐min exposures to far‐red lighte0
Outcome
fewer tillers, longer leaves, less roots, and a higher shoot/root biomass ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat seedlings that received 5‐min exposures to far‐red light at the end of the photosynthetic period each day for 20 consecutive days developed fewer tillers, longer leaves, less roots, and a higher shoot/root biomass ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light reversed far-red effects.

Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
effects of far‐red lighte0
Direction
reversede0
Comparator
far‐red lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of far‐red light were reversed by red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Phytochrome may sense competition and regulate tillering and partitioning.

Gene
phytochromee0
Outcome
development of tillers and the partitioning of photosynthate between shoots and rootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytochrome serves as a sensing mechanism that detects the amount of competition from other plants, and regulates the development of tillers and the partitioning of photosynthate between shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 33 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.