Paper · 2009 · Weed Research

Weed suppression ability of three winter wheat varieties at different row spacing under organic farming conditions

S DREWS; D NEUHOFF; U KÖPKE

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
94
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary For three seasons, six field trials were conducted in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) at different sites in North Rhine‐Westphalia, Germany. The aim was to evaluate the performance of three varieties, which differ in their shading behaviour, in suppressing weeds under organic farming (Ökologischer Landbau) conditions and grown at three row spacings. The experimental factors were cultivar, row width and row orientation. Key parameters of crop and weed development, including ground cover and biomass, were assessed at different growth stages and analysed with anova . Growth of the site‐specific weed vegetation was significantly affected in five of six trials. Weed growth was reduced by cvs Astron and Pegassos compared with cv. Greif, and was lower at 12 cm compared with 24 cm row spacing. No effect of row orientation (East‐West, North‐South) on weed growth was observed. The more competitive cultivars Astron and Pegassos were taller than the less competitive cv. Greif and had higher ground cover and light interception, presumably induced by planophile leaf inclination and partly, in the case of cv. Astron, because of higher leaf area index (LAI). Narrow row spacing (12 cm), resulting in a more even spatial plant distribution, increased crop ground cover, LAI, dry matter and light interception. In two trials, the variety with planophile leaf inclination performed better at wider row spacing, suggesting that planophile wheat cultivars may be advantageous in wider row stands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Astron and Pegassos reduced weed growth compared with Greif.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cvs Astron and Pegassose0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
cv. Greife0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed growth was reduced by cvs Astron and Pegassos compared with cv. Greif”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed growth was lower at 12 cm than at 24 cm row spacing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
12 cme0
Interactor
Weede1weed
Outcome
Weed growthe1
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
24 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was lower at 12 cm compared with 24 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed growth was reduced by cvs Astron and Pegassos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row orientation showed no effect on weed growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
row orientatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
No effecte0
Comparator
East‐West, North‐Southe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effect of row orientation (East‐West, North‐South) on weed growth was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive cultivars were taller and had higher cover and light interception than Greif.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Astron and Pegassose0
Outcome
ground cover and light interceptione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cv. Greife0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The more competitive cultivars Astron and Pegassos were taller than the less competitive cv. Greif and had higher ground cover and light interception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing increased crop ground cover, LAI, dry matter and light interception.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Narrow row spacing (12 cm)e0
Outcome
crop ground cover, LAI, dry matter and light interceptione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow row spacing (12 cm), resulting in a more even spatial plant distribution, increased crop ground cover, LAI, dry matter and light interception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.