Abstract
Abstract The importance of sulfur (S) for corn (Zea mays L.) production on sandy soils has been noted for a number of years. Yet, there has been no extensive evaluation of the timing of S applications on corn production in these specific situations. This study was conducted for the purpose of measuring the effect of split applications of fertilizer S on com grown on irrigated sandy soils. The study was conducted in 1985 and 1986. Fourrâtes of fertilizer S (0, 6.5, 13, and 26 kg/ha) were combined with six times of application schemes in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Granular gypsum was used as the source of S. Corn responded to the use of fertilizer S in 1986 only. Time of application had no significant effect on yield in either year. There were no advantages to the use of split applications. The S concentration in the ear leaf tissue at silking was affected by both rate and time of S application at each experimental site. The current recommendation is to apply fertilizer S, when needed, in a starter fertilizer at planting. The results of this study indicate that there is no need to change this recommendation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Corn responded to sulfur fertilizer only in 1986.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- fertilizer Se0
- Outcome
- Corn respondede0
- Qualifier
- 1986 onlye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn responded to the use of fertilizer S in 1986 only”
Claim · model-written summary
Application timing did not significantly affect yield in either year.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Time of applicatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
- Qualifier
- either yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Time of application had no significant effect on yield in either year”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Split applications gave no advantages.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- split applicationse0
- Outcome
- no advantagese0
- Direction
- no advantagese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were no advantages to the use of split applications”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur rate affected ear leaf sulfur concentration at silking at each site.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Organ / stage
- ear leaf tissue at silkinge0
- Treatment
- ratee0
- Outcome
- S concentration in the ear leaf tissuee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The S concentration in the ear leaf tissue at silking was affected by both rate and time of S application at each experimental site”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur application timing affected ear leaf sulfur concentration at silking at each site.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Organ / stage
- ear leaf tissue at silkinge0
- Treatment
- time of S applicatione0
- Outcome
- S concentration in the ear leaf tissuee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The S concentration in the ear leaf tissue at silking was affected by both rate and time of S application at each experimental site”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that the starter fertilizer sulfur recommendation need not change.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- apply fertilizer S, when needed, in a starter fertilizer at plantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current recommendation is to apply fertilizer S, when needed, in a starter fertilizer at planting. The results of this study indicate that there is no need to change this recommendation”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.