Paper · 2007 · Soil Use and Management

Catch crop strategy and nitrate leaching following grazed grass‐clover

E. M. Hansen; J. Eriksen; F. P. Vinther

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Cultivation of grassland presents a high risk of nitrate leaching. This study aimed to determine if leaching could be reduced by growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage with undersown Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum Lam.) compared with barley grown to maturity with or without an undersown conventional catch crop of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.). All treatments received 0, 60 or 120 kg of ammonium‐N ha −1 in cattle slurry. In spring 2003, two grass‐clover fields (3 and 5 years old, respectively, with different management histories) were ploughed. The effects of the treatments on yield and nitrate leaching were determined in the first year, while the residual effects of the treatments were determined in the second year in a crop of spring barley/perennial ryegrass. Nitrate leaching was estimated in selected treatments using soil water samples from ceramic cups. The experiment showed that compared with treatments without catch crop, green barley/Italian ryegrass reduced leaching by 163–320 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to 95–99%, and the perennial ryegrass reduced leaching to between 34 and 86 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to a reduction of 80 and 66%. Also, in the second growing season, leaching following catch crops was reduced compared with the bare soil treatment. It was concluded that the green barley/Italian ryegrass offers advantages not only for the environment but also for farmers, for whom it provides a fodder high in roughage and avoids the difficulties with clover fatigue increasingly experienced by Danish farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green barley with Italian ryegrass undersown reduced nitrate leaching by 163-320 kg N/ha (95-99%) compared with treatments without catch crop.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
green barley/Italian ryegrasse1
Outcome
leachinge1
Direction
reducede1
Value
163–320 kg N ha −1e1
Qualifier
corresponding to 95–99%e1
Comparator
treatments without catch crope2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“green barley/Italian ryegrass reduced leaching by 163–320 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to 95–99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1094 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with treatments without catch crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial ryegrass catch crop reduced nitrate leaching to 34-86 kg N/ha, a 66-80% reduction, compared with treatments without catch crop.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee4
Treatment
perennial ryegrasse3
Outcome
leachinge3
Direction
reducede3
Value
between 34 and 86 kg N ha −1e3
Qualifier
a reduction of 80 and 66%e3
Comparator
treatments without catch crope2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“compared with treatments without catch crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–998 · show in text ↑
e3

“the perennial ryegrass reduced leaching to between 34 and 86 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to a reduction of 80 and 66%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1216 · show in text ↑
e4

“perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second growing season, leaching after catch crops was reduced compared with bare soil.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
catch cropse5
Outcome
leachinge5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
bare soil treatmente5
Setting
second growing seasone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–208 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the second growing season, leaching following catch crops was reduced compared with the bare soil treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1334 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Green barley with Italian ryegrass offers advantages for the environment and for farmers.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
advantages not only for the environment but also for farmerse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–208 · show in text ↑
e6

“It was concluded that the green barley/Italian ryegrass offers advantages not only for the environment but also for farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1459 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Green barley with Italian ryegrass provides fodder high in roughage.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
provides a fodder high in roughagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–208 · show in text ↑
e7

“it provides a fodder high in roughage and avoids the difficulties with clover fatigue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1555 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Green barley with Italian ryegrass avoids the difficulties with clover fatigue.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
avoids the difficulties with clover fatiguee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–208 · show in text ↑
e7

“it provides a fodder high in roughage and avoids the difficulties with clover fatigue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1555 · show in text ↑

Lolium multiflorum · environment: emissions · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cover crop · environment: emissions · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.