Paper · 2005 · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

An Iron Uptake Operon Required for Proper Nodule Development in the Bradyrhizobium japonicum-Soybean Symbiosis

Heather P. Benson; Eric Boncompagni; Mary Lou Guerinot

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rhizobia live in the soil or enter into a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with a suitable host plant. Each environment presents different challenges with respect to iron acquisition. The soybean symbiont Bradyrhizobium japonicum 61A152 can utilize a variety of siderophores (Fe[III]-specific ligands). Purification of iron-regulated outer membrane proteins had previously allowed the cloning of a gene, fegA, from B. japonicum 61A152, whose predicted protein shares significant amino acid similarity with known TonB-dependent siderophore receptors. Here, we show that fegA is in an operon with a gene, fegB, that is predicted to encode an inner membrane protein. Characterization of fegAB and fegB mutants shows that bothfegA and fegB are required for utilization of the siderophore ferrichrome. Whereas thefegB mutant forms a normal symbiosis, the fegAB mutant has a dramatic phenotype in planta. Six weeks after inoculation with a fegAB strain, soybean nodules do not contain leghemoglobin and do not fix nitrogen. Infected cells contain few symbiosomes and are filled with vesicles. As ferrichrome is a fungal siderophore not likely to be available in nodules, the symbiotic defect suggests that the fegAB operon is serving a different function in planta, possibly one involved in signaling between the two partners.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fegA is in an operon with fegB.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
fegAe0
Outcome
fegA is in an operon with a gene, fegBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fegA is in an operon with a gene, fegB, that is predicted to encode an inner membrane protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fegA and fegB were required for ferrichrome utilization by the soybean symbiont.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 61A152Bradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Gene
fegBe0
Outcome
utilization of the siderophore ferrichromee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bothfegA and fegB are required for utilization of the siderophore ferrichrome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean symbiont Bradyrhizobium japonicum 61A152”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fegB mutant formed normal soybean symbiosis.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
fegB mutante0symbiont
Gene
fegBe0
Outcome
forms a normal symbiosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thefegB mutant forms a normal symbiosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean nodules inoculated with the fegAB strain lacked leghemoglobin after six weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Treatment
inoculation with a fegAB straine0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicumBradyrhizobium japonicumt0symbiont
Gene
fegABe0
Outcome
do not contain leghemoglobine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six weeks after inoculation with a fegAB strain, soybean nodules do not contain leghemoglobin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bradyrhizobium japonicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean nodules inoculated with the fegAB strain did not fix nitrogen after six weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Treatment
inoculation with a fegAB straine0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicumBradyrhizobium japonicumt0symbiont
Gene
fegABe0
Outcome
do not fix nitrogene0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six weeks after inoculation with a fegAB strain, soybean nodules do not contain leghemoglobin and do not fix nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bradyrhizobium japonicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected soybean cells contained few symbiosomes and were filled with vesicles.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
Infected cellse0
Outcome
few symbiosomes and are filled with vesiclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infected cells contain few symbiosomes and are filled with vesicles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–100 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that the fegAB operon may have another function in planta, possibly signaling.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
fegABe0
Outcome
different function in plantae0
Qualifier
possibly one involved in signaling between the two partnerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the symbiotic defect suggests that the fegAB operon is serving a different function in planta, possibly one involved in signaling between the two partners.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–100 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Bradyrhizobium japonicum · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

86 papers: 64 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.