Paper · 1998 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Evaluation of metam‐potassium as fumigant and potassium source for tomato1

D. G. Himelrick; G. E. Boyhan

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were grown for two seasons on polyethylene‐mulched beds to evaluate metam‐potassium (metam‐K) as both a fumigant and K source in comparison to metam‐sodium (metam‐Na) fumigant and KCl fertilizer applied preplant or injected. Treatments without fumigation had significantly lower early yield compared to treatments with metam‐Na at 468 or 935 L ha‐1 or metam‐K at 281 L ha‐1 in 1993. There were no significant differences in early yield for 1994. No by‐year interaction for total yield were noted so results were combined for both years. Tomatoes grown with metam‐Na at 468 L ha‐1 produced significantly higher yields than all the other treatments. The leaf K concentration in 1993 was 34 g kg‐1 with metam‐K at 561 L ha‐1 which was greater than treatments with Kcl. However, metam‐K showed little advantage in performance over metam‐Na as a fumigant or KCl as a fertilizer source.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfumigated treatments had significantly lower early yield than specified metam-Na and metam-K treatments in 1993.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
without fumigatione0
Outcome
early yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
1993e0
Comparator
treatments with metam‐Na at 468 or 935 L ha‐1 or metam‐K at 281 L ha‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments without fumigation had significantly lower early yield compared to treatments with metam‐Na at 468 or 935 L ha‐1 or metam‐K at 281 L ha‐1 in 1993.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield differences in 1994 were not significant.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Outcome
early yielde0
Qualifier
1994e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in early yield for 1994.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–495 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield showed no by-year interaction.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Outcome
No by‐year interaction for total yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No by‐year interaction for total yield were noted so results were combined for both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metam-Na at 468 L ha-1 produced significantly higher tomato yields than all other treatments.

Treatment
metam‐Na at 468 L ha‐1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes grown with metam‐Na at 468 L ha‐1 produced significantly higher yields than all the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf potassium was 34 g kg-1 under metam-K at 561 L ha-1 in 1993, greater than with Kcl treatments.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
metam‐K at 561 L ha‐1e0
Outcome
leaf K concentratione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
34 g kg‐1e0
Qualifier
1993e0
Comparator
Kcle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf K concentration in 1993 was 34 g kg‐1 with metam‐K at 561 L ha‐1 which was greater than treatments with Kcl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–815 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metam-K showed little performance advantage over metam-Na as a fumigant.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
metam‐Ke0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
little advantagee0
Qualifier
as a fumigante0
Comparator
metam‐Nae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, metam‐K showed little advantage in performance over metam‐Na as a fumigant or KCl as a fertilizer source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metam-K showed little performance advantage over KCl as a fertilizer source.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
metam‐Ke0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
little advantagee0
Qualifier
as a fertilizer sourcee0
Comparator
KCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, metam‐K showed little advantage in performance over metam‐Na as a fumigant or KCl as a fertilizer source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑

solarization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

32 papers: 22 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.