Paper · 2001 · Journal of Dairy Science

The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Other Additives on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Barley Silage

L. Kung; N.K. Ranjit

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
336
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability. Treatments were untreated forage, forage treated with several amounts of Lactobacillus buchneri and enzymes (L. buchneri at 1 x 10(5), 5 x 10(5), and 1 x 10(6) cfu/g of fresh forage), forage treated with an inoculant containing (Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, and enzymes), or forage treated with a buffered propionic acid-based additive (0.2% of fresh weight). Sixty-nine d after ensiling, silages treated with L. buchneri and enzymes had lower pH, but had higher concentrations of acetic and propionic acids and higher concentrations of ethanol when compared with untreated silage. Silage treated with the multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum had lower pH and higher concentrations of lactic acid, but lower concentrations of ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber than did untreated silage. The addition of the buffered propionic acid additive resulted in silage with higher concentrations of lactic and acetic acid compared with untreated silage. Numbers of yeasts in all silages were low at silo opening (less than 3.0 log cfu/g) and were numerically the lowest in silages treated with L. buchneri but only treatment with the intermediate and high level of L. buchneri improved the aerobic stability of silage. Because of the altered fermentation pattern, inoculation with L. buchneri, when applied at equal to or more than 5 x 10(5) cfu/g, and enzymes improved the aerobic stability of barley silage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri and enzymes lowered silage pH compared with untreated silage

Treatment
L. buchneri and enzymese1
Interactor
L. buchnerie1other
Outcome
pHe1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
untreated silagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages treated with L. buchneri and enzymes had lower pH, but had higher concentrations of acetic and propionic acids and higher concentrations of ethanol when compared with untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri and enzymes increased acetic and propionic acid concentrations compared with untreated silage

Treatment
L. buchneri and enzymese1
Interactor
L. buchnerie1other
Outcome
acetic and propionic acidse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
untreated silagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages treated with L. buchneri and enzymes had lower pH, but had higher concentrations of acetic and propionic acids and higher concentrations of ethanol when compared with untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri and enzymes increased ethanol concentration compared with untreated silage

Treatment
L. buchneri and enzymese1
Interactor
L. buchnerie1other
Outcome
ethanole1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
untreated silagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages treated with L. buchneri and enzymes had lower pH, but had higher concentrations of acetic and propionic acids and higher concentrations of ethanol when compared with untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum lowered silage pH compared with untreated silage

Treatment
multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarume2
Interactor
L. plantarume2other
Outcome
pHe2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
untreated silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silage treated with the multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum had lower pH and higher concentrations of lactic acid, but lower concentrations of ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber than did untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum increased lactic acid compared with untreated silage

Treatment
multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarume2
Interactor
L. plantarume2other
Outcome
lactic acide2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
untreated silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silage treated with the multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum had lower pH and higher concentrations of lactic acid, but lower concentrations of ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber than did untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum lowered ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber compared with untreated silage

Treatment
multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarume2
Interactor
L. plantarume2other
Outcome
ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fibere2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
untreated silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silage treated with the multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum had lower pH and higher concentrations of lactic acid, but lower concentrations of ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber than did untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The buffered propionic acid additive increased lactic and acetic acid compared with untreated silage

Treatment
buffered propionic acid additivee3
Outcome
lactic and acetic acide3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
untreated silagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of the buffered propionic acid additive resulted in silage with higher concentrations of lactic and acetic acid compared with untreated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast numbers were low at silo opening, under 3.0 log cfu/g, and numerically lowest with L. buchneri

Interactor
L. buchnerie4other
Outcome
Numbers of yeastse4
Value
less than 3.0 log cfu/ge4
Qualifier
numerically the lowest in silages treated with L. buchnerie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e4

“Numbers of yeasts in all silages were low at silo opening (less than 3.0 log cfu/g) and were numerically the lowest in silages treated with L. buchneri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the intermediate and high levels of L. buchneri improved aerobic stability of silage

Treatment
intermediate and high level of L. buchnerie5
Interactor
L. buchnerie5other
Outcome
aerobic stabilitye5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
e5

“only treatment with the intermediate and high level of L. buchneri improved the aerobic stability of silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1465 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.