Paper · 1985 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Nodule Activity in Soybean Cultivars Exposed to Ozone and Sulfur Dioxide

A. W. Jones; C. L. Mulchi; W. J. Kenworthy

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In an effort to obtain a greater understanding of the mechanisms of action for air pollutants on yield‐limiting processes in crop plants, studies were conducted in the field and greenhouse in 1979 to investigate the effects of O 3 and SO 2 exposures on nodule activities in roots and chlorophylls a and b contents in leaves of soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Six cultivars of soybeans were exposed 4 h d −1 for 5 successive days during flowering and pod development to the combination of 6.7 µ mol m −3 O 3 and 11.1 µ mol m −3 SO 2 in activated charcoal‐filtered air. Acetylene reduction procedures were used to assay nodule activities. Significant differences ( P < 0.1) were observed in total nodule activity (TNA) per plant for treatments and cultivars in combined analysis of variance (ANOVAs) for two greenhouse studies and two exposure dates in the field; however, treatment × cultivar interactions were nonsignificant in all cases. Compared with filtered air controls, the air pollution treatment reduced TNA by an average of 16.4 and 27.4% in the greenhouse and field studies, respectively. Specific nodule activities (SNA) were unaffected by the treatments in both studies. In the greenhouse studies, the O 4 and SO 2 treatment lowered the chlorophyll a content by 14.1%, but no significant differences were observed in the field study. Chlorophyll b contents were unaffected by treatments in both investigations. In these studies, the sensitivity of changes in chlorophyll contents in soybean leaves following exposures to O 3 and SO 2 at concentrations found in the atmosphere were found to be too low to be of practical value for screening plants for tolerance to air pollutants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nodule activity per plant differed significantly (P < 0.1) among treatments and among cultivars.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
total nodule activity (TNA) per plante1
Qualifier
P < 0.1e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences ( P < 0.1) were observed in total nodule activity (TNA) per plant for treatments and cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment by cultivar interactions on nodule activity were nonsignificant in all cases.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
treatment × cultivar interactionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment × cultivar interactions were nonsignificant in all cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The O3 and SO2 air pollution treatment reduced total nodule activity by an average of 16.4% in the greenhouse compared with filtered air controls.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
air pollution treatmente1
Outcome
TNAe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
16.4e1
Comparator
filtered air controlse1
Setting
greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with filtered air controls, the air pollution treatment reduced TNA by an average of 16.4 and 27.4% in the greenhouse and field studies, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The O3 and SO2 air pollution treatment reduced total nodule activity by an average of 27.4% in the field compared with filtered air controls.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
air pollution treatmente1
Outcome
TNAe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
27.4%e1
Comparator
filtered air controlse1
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with filtered air controls, the air pollution treatment reduced TNA by an average of 16.4 and 27.4% in the greenhouse and field studies, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific nodule activities were unaffected by the treatments in both greenhouse and field studies.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
the treatmentse1
Outcome
Specific nodule activities (SNA)e1
Direction
unaffectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Specific nodule activities (SNA) were unaffected by the treatments in both studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse studies the O3 and SO2 treatment lowered leaf chlorophyll a content by 14.1%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
O 4 and SO 2 treatmente1
Outcome
chlorophyll a contente1
Direction
lowerede1
Value
14.1%e1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the greenhouse studies, the O 4 and SO 2 treatment lowered the chlorophyll a content by 14.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field study no significant differences in chlorophyll a content were observed with the O3 and SO2 treatment.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
O 4 and SO 2 treatmente1
Outcome
chlorophyll a contente1
Direction
no significant differencese1
Setting
field studye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“the O 4 and SO 2 treatment lowered the chlorophyll a content by 14.1%, but no significant differences were observed in the field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b contents were unaffected by the treatments in both greenhouse and field investigations.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
Chlorophyll b contentse1
Direction
unaffectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll b contents were unaffected by treatments in both investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1434 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that changes in soybean leaf chlorophyll after O3 and SO2 exposure were too insensitive to be of practical value for screening plants for tolerance to air pollutants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
too low to be of practical value for screening plants for tolerance to air pollutantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sensitivity of changes in chlorophyll contents in soybean leaves following exposures to O 3 and SO 2 at concentrations found in the atmosphere were found to be too low to be of practical value for screening plants for tolerance to air pollutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1703 · show in text ↑

pollution · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pollution · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.