Paper · 1968 · Agronomy Journal

Boron and Manganese Effects on Cotton Yield, Lint Quality, and Earliness of Harvest1

O. E. Anderson; Fred C. Boswell

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Manganese (2.23 and 4.46 kg/ha) and boron (0.45 and 0.89 kg/ha) were applied as a sidedressing to cotton on 13 different soils in Georgia. Both total yield and the percent of that yield obtained at first harvest were increased without detrimental effect on lint strength, length, or fineness, despite the fact that no deficiency symptoms of Mn or B were observed on the check plots. Yield increases were negatively correlated with the water soluble soil Mn and B, and positively correlated with pH. With few exceptions, the Mn and B content of soil and leaf samples from untreated plots were higher than those usually rated as deficient, suggesting that cotton yield and earliness of harvest benefit from relatively high levels of these elements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese and boron sidedressing increased total cotton yield.

Treatment
Manganese (2.23 and 4.46 kg/ha) and boron (0.45 and 0.89 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Georgiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese (2.23 and 4.46 kg/ha) and boron (0.45 and 0.89 kg/ha) were applied as a sidedressing to cotton on 13 different soils in Georgia. Both total yield and the percent of that yield obtained at first harvest were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese and boron sidedressing increased yield percentage at first harvest.

Treatment
Manganese (2.23 and 4.46 kg/ha) and boron (0.45 and 0.89 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
percent of that yield obtained at first harveste0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Georgiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese (2.23 and 4.46 kg/ha) and boron (0.45 and 0.89 kg/ha) were applied as a sidedressing to cotton on 13 different soils in Georgia. Both total yield and the percent of that yield obtained at first harvest were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sidedressing did not harm lint strength, length, or fineness.

Outcome
lint strength, length, or finenesse0
Direction
without detrimental effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without detrimental effect on lint strength, length, or fineness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Check plots showed no Mn or B deficiency symptoms.

Outcome
deficiency symptoms of Mn or Be0
Setting
check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no deficiency symptoms of Mn or B were observed on the check plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases were negatively correlated with water-soluble soil Mn and B.

Compound
Mn and Be0
Outcome
Yield increasese0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increases were negatively correlated with the water soluble soil Mn and B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases were positively correlated with pH.

Outcome
Yield increasese0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increases were negatively correlated with the water soluble soil Mn and B, and positively correlated with pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn and B in untreated soil and leaves usually exceeded deficiency ratings.

Outcome
Mn and B content of soil and leaf samplese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
those usually rated as deficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn and B content of soil and leaf samples from untreated plots were higher than those usually rated as deficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.