Paper · 2014 · Archives of Environmental Protection

Enzymatic Activity and Certain Chemical Properties of Grey-Brown Podzolic Soil (Haplic Luvisol) Amended with Compost of Tobacco Wastes

Alicja Szwed; Justyna Bohacz

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The paper addresses the effect of a compost prepared from tobacco wastes with an admixture of bark and straw on the enzymatic activity and certain chemical properties of a grey-brown podzolic soil amended with that compost. The study was conducted under the conditions of a pot experiment in which the soil material was collected from the surface horizon of the grey-brown podzolic soil. The effect of the application of the compost was compared with soil without such amendment. The test plant was maize cv. Kosmo 230. Fertilisation of the light soil with the compost studied caused changes in the enzymatic activity of the soil that were related both to the dose of the compost and to the kind of enzyme studied. With increase in the dose of the compost there was an increase in dehydrogenase activity (highest dose) and a significant decrease in the activity of acid phosphatase. Moreover, it was observed that tobacco compost was a significant source that enriched the light soil in organic matter, total nitrogen, and available forms of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium, which was evident in increased yields of maize grown as the test plant. Significant correlations were also demonstrated between a majority of the biochemical and chemical parameters, which indicates that those parameters characterise well the biological properties of a grey-brown podzolic soil amended with tobacco compost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased soil dehydrogenase activity at the highest dose.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
composte0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
highest dosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in the dose of the compost there was an increase in dehydrogenase activity (highest dose)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Wastes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was maize cv. Kosmo 230.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost dose significantly decreased soil acid phosphatase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
composte0
Outcome
activity of acid phosphatasee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in the dose of the compost there was an increase in dehydrogenase activity (highest dose) and a significant decrease in the activity of acid phosphatase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Wastes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was maize cv. Kosmo 230.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco compost enriched soil organic matter, total nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium and potassium.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
tobacco composte0
Outcome
organic matter, total nitrogen, and available forms of phosphorus, magnesium and potassiume0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco compost was a significant source that enriched the light soil in organic matter, total nitrogen, and available forms of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Wastes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was maize cv. Kosmo 230.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco compost increased maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
tobacco composte0
Outcome
yields of maizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco compost was a significant source that enriched the light soil in organic matter, total nitrogen, and available forms of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium, which was evident in increased yields of maize grown as the test plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1157 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most soil biochemical and chemical parameters were significantly correlated.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
correlationse0
Setting
grey-brown podzolic soilt0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant correlations were also demonstrated between a majority of the biochemical and chemical parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“grey-brown podzolic soil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“The test plant was maize cv. Kosmo 230.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–528 · show in text ↑

Nicotiana tabacum · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Nicotiana tabacum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 73 positive, 17 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.