Abstract
The different crop straws were returned to the soil to study the effects on maize yield and soil fertility.The results showed that the maize yields with maize and tobacco straw,rape and potato straw,and wheat straw treatments increased by 24.82% to 25.69%,18.40% to 19.44% and 8.33% compared with CK respectively.Different straws can increase soil organic matter,total nitrogen and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen content and keep the balance between active P and active K in the soil.The tobacco straw has the strong ability to increase soil active K content,the maize straw is better to enhancing soil organic matter and N content,the rape straw has the strongest ability to increase N content,and potato and wheat straw has the lower ability to increase soil fertility.The crop straws increase maize yield by improving maize growing characters
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Maize and tobacco straw treatments increased maize yield by 24.82% to 25.69% compared with CK.
- Treatment
- maize and tobacco strawe0
- Outcome
- maize yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 24.82% to 25.69%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the maize yields with maize and tobacco straw,rape and potato straw,and wheat straw treatments increased by 24.82% to 25.69%,18.40% to 19.44% and 8.33% compared with CK respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rape and potato straw treatments increased maize yield by 18.40% to 19.44% compared with CK.
- Treatment
- rape and potato strawe0
- Outcome
- maize yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.40% to 19.44%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the maize yields with maize and tobacco straw,rape and potato straw,and wheat straw treatments increased by 24.82% to 25.69%,18.40% to 19.44% and 8.33% compared with CK respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat straw treatment increased maize yield by 8.33% compared with CK.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the maize yields with maize and tobacco straw,rape and potato straw,and wheat straw treatments increased by 24.82% to 25.69%,18.40% to 19.44% and 8.33% compared with CK respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Different straw returns increased soil organic matter, total nitrogen, and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen.
- Treatment
- Different strawse0
- Outcome
- soil organic matter,total nitrogen and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Different straws can increase soil organic matter,total nitrogen and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen content”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw return maintained the balance of active soil P and K.
- Treatment
- Different strawse0
- Outcome
- balance between active P and active K in the soile0
- Direction
- keepe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Different straws can increase soil organic matter,total nitrogen and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen content and keep the balance between active P and active K in the soil.”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
Tobacco straw had strong ability to increase active soil K.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The tobacco straw has the strong ability to increase soil active K content”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize straw was better at enhancing soil organic matter and N.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maize straw is better to enhancing soil organic matter and N content”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
Rape straw had the strongest ability to increase soil N.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the rape straw has the strongest ability to increase N content”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
Potato straw had low ability to increase soil fertility.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“potato and wheat straw has the lower ability to increase soil fertility”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat straw had low ability to increase soil fertility.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“potato and wheat straw has the lower ability to increase soil fertility”
e1“maize yield and soil fertility”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attribute increased maize yield to improved growing characters.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The crop straws increase maize yield by improving maize growing characters”
The same questions in other papers
Brassica napus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Brassica napus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Triticum aestivum · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Solanum tuberosum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →Nicotiana tabacum · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Nicotiana tabacum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.