Paper · 2008 · PubMed

[Effects of intercropping different crops with maize on the Cd uptake by maize].

Ning-Yu Li; Zhi-An Li; Yong-Zhen Ding; et al.

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of intercropping 7 kinds of crops on the Cd uptake by maize (Zea mays L.). The results showed that most intercrops had no significant effects on the growth of maize, only with purple haricot reduced the maize biomass by 32.2% of the control. Legume crops enhanced the total quantity of Cd in maize in a great magnitude, and chickpea worked most efficiently, which doubled the Cd quantity in maize. The 7 intercrops showed different capability of Cd uptake, among which, rape and amaranth absorbed larger amount of Cd, with a Cd level of 53.9 mg x kg(-1) and 51.0 mg x kg(-1) in their aboveground parts, respectively, and of 91.8 mg x kg(-1) in amaranth root when the soil Cd content was 3 mg x kg(-1) soil. There was an interaction between maize and intercrops in Cd uptake. Legumes absorbed smaller amount of Cd but significantly increased the Cd uptake by maize, while amaranth was in adverse. Rape had a higher level of Cd concentration in its shoot, but reduced the Cd in aboveground part of maize. It was indicated that if maize was used for phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil, a higher efficiency of Cd removal could be achieved by intercropping it with legumes. Rape and amaranth could be the two promising plants for phytoremediation because of their high Cd accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most intercrops did not significantly change maize growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
most intercropse0
Outcome
growth of maizee0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most intercrops had no significant effects on the growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purple haricot reduced maize biomass by 32.2% of control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
purple haricote0
Outcome
maize biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
32.2%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“purple haricot reduced the maize biomass by 32.2% of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume crops enhanced total maize Cd quantity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Legume cropse0
Outcome
total quantity of Cd in maizee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Legume crops enhanced the total quantity of Cd in maize in a great magnitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–383 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea doubled maize Cd quantity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
chickpeae0
Outcome
Cd quantity in maizee0
Direction
doublede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea worked most efficiently, which doubled the Cd quantity in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rape accumulated 53.9 mg x kg(-1) Cd aboveground.

Organ / stage
aboveground partse0
Outcome
Cd levele0
Direction
largere0
Value
53.9 mg x kg(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rape and amaranth absorbed larger amount of Cd, with a Cd level of 53.9 mg x kg(-1) and 51.0 mg x kg(-1) in their aboveground parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranth accumulated 51.0 mg x kg(-1) Cd aboveground.

Organ / stage
aboveground partse0
Outcome
Cd levele0
Direction
largere0
Value
51.0 mg x kg(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amaranth absorbed larger amount of Cd, with a Cd level of 53.9 mg x kg(-1) and 51.0 mg x kg(-1) in their aboveground parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranth roots accumulated 91.8 mg x kg(-1) Cd at the specified soil concentration.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
Cde0
Value
91.8 mg x kg(-1)e0
Qualifier
soil Cd content was 3 mg x kg(-1) soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91.8 mg x kg(-1) in amaranth root when the soil Cd content was 3 mg x kg(-1) soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Legumes significantly increased maize Cd uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Legumese0
Outcome
Cd uptake by maizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Legumes absorbed smaller amount of Cd but significantly increased the Cd uptake by maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranth had the adverse effect on maize Cd uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
amaranthe0
Outcome
adversee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while amaranth was in adverse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rape had a higher shoot Cd concentration.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
Cd concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rape had a higher level of Cd concentration in its shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rape reduced Cd in the aboveground maize portion.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Rapee0
Outcome
Cd in aboveground part of maizee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rape had a higher level of Cd concentration in its shoot, but reduced the Cd in aboveground part of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume intercropping was recommended to improve Cd removal by maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
intercropping it with legumese0
Outcome
higher efficiency of Cd removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher efficiency of Cd removal could be achieved by intercropping it with legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–229 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rape was identified as promising for Cd phytoremediation.

Outcome
promising plants for phytoremediatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rape and amaranth could be the two promising plants for phytoremediation because of their high Cd accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1350 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranth was identified as promising for Cd phytoremediation.

Outcome
promising plants for phytoremediatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rape and amaranth could be the two promising plants for phytoremediation because of their high Cd accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1350 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Cicer arietinum · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

184 papers: 138 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 138 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.