Paper · 2010 · Agronomy Journal

Winter Cover Crops Affect Monoculture Maize Yield and Nitrogen Leaching under Irrigated Mediterranean Conditions

Montserrat Salmerón; José Cavero; Dolores Quílez; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Under semiarid Mediterranean conditions irrigated maize ( Zea mays L.) has been associated with nitrate pollution of surface water and groundwater. Cover crops grown during the intercrop period of maize could reduce N leaching. A 2‐yr experiment was conducted in drainage lysimeters with three cover crops: barley ( Hordeum vulgare L), winter rape ( Brassica rapa L.), or common vetch ( Vicia sativa L.). Bare soil was used as control treatment. Maize was fertilized with 300 kg ha −1 N in the control, and this amount was reduced after a cover crop according to the N content in the aboveground cover crop biomass. Barley and winter rape biomass had a higher N content than vetch (130–170 vs. 50 kg ha −1 ). The vetch treatment did not reduce N leaching or affect maize yield. The barley and winter rape treatments reduced N leaching by 80% compared to the control (25 kg ha −1 yr −1 ) mainly due to a reduction of NO 3 –N concentration in drainage. Maize yield was reduced by 2.7 Mg ha −1 after barley and winter rape but still high (≈14 Mg ha −1 ). This reduction was due to an N deficiency caused by lower soil N in spring after the cover crop and insufficient N mineralization and/or lack of synchronization with maize N uptake. To use nonlegume winter cover crops to reduce N leaching in monoculture maize it is necessary to consider that N mineralization may not be sufficient to fulfill maize N requirements and N fertilizer adjustment tools should be developed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley biomass had higher N content than vetch biomass.

Outcome
N contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
130–170e0
Qualifier
50 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley and winter rape biomass had a higher N content than vetch (130–170 vs. 50 kg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter rape biomass had higher N content than vetch biomass.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napuse0
Outcome
N contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
130–170e0
Qualifier
50 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley and winter rape biomass had a higher N content than vetch (130–170 vs. 50 kg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch cover cropping did not reduce N leaching.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
vetch treatmente0
Outcome
N leachinge0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vetch treatment did not reduce N leaching or affect maize yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch cover cropping did not affect maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
vetch treatmente0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vetch treatment did not reduce N leaching or affect maize yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

barley cover cropping reduced N leaching by 80% versus control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
barleye0
Outcome
N leachinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
25 kg ha −1 yr −1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The barley and winter rape treatments reduced N leaching by 80% compared to the control (25 kg ha −1 yr −1 ) mainly due to a reduction of NO 3 –N concentration in drainage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

winter rape cover cropping reduced N leaching by 80% versus control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
winter rapee0
Outcome
N leachinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
25 kg ha −1 yr −1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The barley and winter rape treatments reduced N leaching by 80% compared to the control (25 kg ha −1 yr −1 ) mainly due to a reduction of NO 3 –N concentration in drainage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield declined by 2.7 Mg ha −1 after barley.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
barleye0
Outcome
Maize yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.7 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
≈14 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yield was reduced by 2.7 Mg ha −1 after barley and winter rape but still high (≈14 Mg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield declined by 2.7 Mg ha −1 after winter rape.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
winter rapee0
Outcome
Maize yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.7 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
≈14 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yield was reduced by 2.7 Mg ha −1 after barley and winter rape but still high (≈14 Mg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1051 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute lower maize yield after cover cropping to N deficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cover crope0
Outcome
reductione0
Qualifier
N deficiency caused by lower soil N in springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduction was due to an N deficiency caused by lower soil N in spring after the cover crop and insufficient N mineralization and/or lack of synchronization with maize N uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend developing N fertilizer adjustment tools for maize after nonlegume cover crops.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
N fertilizer adjustment tools should be developede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To use nonlegume winter cover crops to reduce N leaching in monoculture maize it is necessary to consider that N mineralization may not be sufficient to fulfill maize N requirements and N fertilizer adjustment tools should be developed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1470 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Brassica napus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.