Paper · 2005 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Breeding Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] for cold-pressed, edible oil production—a review

R. N. Oram; J. T. O. Kirk; P. E. Veness; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
71
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] is a more productive oilseed than canola (B. napus L.) in hot regions of Russia, India, China, and Canada with somewhat unreliable rainfalls, whereas canola is the higher yielding species in more temperate, wetter regions. The specific agronomic features of the species, and their performance in various Australian regions are reviewed. The discovery of the genes for low erucic acid oil production in the seeds of Indian mustard began the conversion of this ancient crop to a canola-type oilseed for dry areas. Initially, many accessions were field-tested at Wagga Wagga and Canberra, but 2 seed-borne diseases, leaf and stem blight and seed rot, were destructive. Accessions from South Asia were severely damaged by the blight caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola Young, Dye & Wilkie 1978, whereas most of the cultivars from latitudes above 45°N were resistant. A phytotron procedure was developed for screening seedlings. The segregation pattern in F2 families from resistant × susceptible crosses suggested that reactions to a typical Pseudomonas isolate were controlled largely by co-dominant resistance (PsmR) and susceptibility (PsmS) alleles at one locus. F3 families with field resistance equal to the PsmR/PsmR parents were readily recovered, indicating that few or no modifying genes affected disease reactions. Resistant families selected from each of 6 crosses yielded 13.8% more seed (P < 0.001) than the corresponding segregating and susceptible families when these were tested at Canberra and Wagga Wagga. The disease became unimportant when most entries in field trials were resistant. A seed-rotting disease caused by a yeast with distinctive ascospores closely resembling those of Nematospora sinecauda Holley, Allan-Wotjas & Phipps-Todd 1984 occurred in some imported and locally grown seed samples, but was eliminated by hot water treatment of seed prior to sowing and by control of the presumed insect vector, Nysius vinitor (Bergroth), during seed maturation in the field. No previous record of the occurrence of this disease in Australia was found in the literature by a plant pathologist. The availability of breeding lines with low erucic acid seed oil, Pseudomonas resistance, and a predominance of propenyl glucosinolate in the meal permitted the development of a cold-pressed, edible oil industry by a family company (Yandilla Mustard Oil Enterprise) at Wallendbeen, NSW. The original oil has a mild nutty flavour, but now a larger proportion of the market requires a pungent, mustard-flavoured oil containing a trace of propenyl isothiocyanate, the hydrolytic product of the corresponding glucosinolate in the meal. The full-flavoured meal is sold for table mustard and pickle manufacture, as a stock feed ingredient containing approximately 30% protein and 18% oil, and for the distillation, by another small company at Cowra, NSW, of propenyl isothiocyanate, which is used as a flavouring and preservative in food, especially in Japan. This review describes the breeding of cultivars for cold-pressed oil production, as an off-shoot of the canola-grade B. juncea project. Five successively improved, Pseudomonas-resistant cultivars were developed by crossing and pedigree selection for higher yield under a range of limiting conditions, and released for cold-pressed, low erucic acid oil production. The rate of yield increase in the cultivars released between 1989 and 2001 was 2.4% per annum as judged from small plot yields of all cultivars in each of 4 years at Wallendbeen. Flowering time adjustment provided a one-off improvement, but continued progress seems possible by field selection for traits such as increased resistance to the Sclerotinia and Alternaria pathogens, resistance to acid soils, waterlogging, frost at flowering, heat and drought during seed maturation, and increased efficiency of nutrient utilisation. The nutraceutical properties of mustard oil, and the chemical differences among current B. juncea seed products, are described. Possible future developments are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard is more productive than canola in hot, unreliable-rainfall regions.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
more productive oilseede0
Direction
more productivee0
Comparator
canolae0
Setting
hot regions of Russia, India, China, and Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] is a more productive oilseed than canola (B. napus L.) in hot regions of Russia, India, China, and Canada with somewhat unreliable rainfalls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Canola yields more in temperate, wetter regions.

Outcome
higher yielding speciese0
Direction
higher yieldinge0
Setting
more temperate, wetter regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola is the higher yielding species in more temperate, wetter regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–266 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

South Asian mustard accessions were severely damaged by Pseudomonas blight.

Material
Accessions from South Asiae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicolaPseudomonas syringae pv. maculicolae0pathogen
Outcome
severely damaged by the blighte0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Accessions from South Asia were severely damaged by the blight caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola Young, Dye & Wilkie 1978”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most mustard cultivars from above 45°N resisted the blight.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
resistante0
Setting
latitudes above 45°Ne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“most of the cultivars from latitudes above 45°N were resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A phytotron seedling screening procedure was developed.

Outcome
screening seedlingse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“A phytotron procedure was developed for screening seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Responses to a Pseudomonas isolate were largely controlled by co-dominant PsmR and PsmS alleles at one locus.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0pathogen
Gene
PsmRe0
Outcome
reactions to a typical Pseudomonas isolatee0
Qualifier
PsmSe0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reactions to a typical Pseudomonas isolate were controlled largely by co-dominant resistance (PsmR) and susceptibility (PsmS) alleles at one locus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field-resistant F3 families matched PsmR/PsmR parents, with few or no modifying genes inferred.

Material
F3 familiese0
Outcome
field resistancee0
Direction
equal toe0
Qualifier
few or no modifying genese0
Comparator
PsmR/PsmR parentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“F3 families with field resistance equal to the PsmR/PsmR parents were readily recovered, indicating that few or no modifying genes affected disease reactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant families yielded 13.8% more seed than segregating and susceptible families.

Material
Resistant familiese0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
moree0
Value
13.8%e0
Comparator
corresponding segregating and susceptible familiese0
Setting
Canberra and Wagga Waggae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Resistant families selected from each of 6 crosses yielded 13.8% more seed (P < 0.001) than the corresponding segregating and susceptible families when these were tested at Canberra and Wagga Wagga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rot occurred in imported and local mustard seed samples and was attributed to a yeast resembling Nematospora sinecauda.

Interactor
a yeaste0pathogen
Outcome
seed-rotting diseasee0
Qualifier
some imported and locally grown seed samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A seed-rotting disease caused by a yeast with distinctive ascospores closely resembling those of Nematospora sinecauda Holley, Allan-Wotjas & Phipps-Todd 1984 occurred in some imported and locally grown seed samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water seed treatment eliminated the seed-rotting disease.

Treatment
hot water treatment of seed prior to sowinge0
Outcome
seed-rotting diseasee1
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“was eliminated by hot water treatment of seed prior to sowing and by control of the presumed insect vector, Nysius vinitor (Bergroth), during seed maturation in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2048 · show in text ↑
e1

“A seed-rotting disease caused by a yeast with distinctive ascospores closely resembling those of Nematospora sinecauda Holley, Allan-Wotjas & Phipps-Todd 1984 occurred in some imported and locally grown seed samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of presumed Nysius vinitor vectors eliminated seed rot.

Treatment
control of the presumed insect vectore0
Interactor
Nysius vinitorNysius vinitore0pest
Outcome
seed-rotting diseasee1
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“was eliminated by hot water treatment of seed prior to sowing and by control of the presumed insect vector, Nysius vinitor (Bergroth), during seed maturation in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2048 · show in text ↑
e1

“A seed-rotting disease caused by a yeast with distinctive ascospores closely resembling those of Nematospora sinecauda Holley, Allan-Wotjas & Phipps-Todd 1984 occurred in some imported and locally grown seed samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Five improved Pseudomonas-resistant cultivars were released for cold-pressed low-erucic oil.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0pathogen
Outcome
Pseudomonas-resistant cultivarse0
Value
Fivee0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five successively improved, Pseudomonas-resistant cultivars were developed by crossing and pedigree selection for higher yield under a range of limiting conditions, and released for cold-pressed, low erucic acid oil production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3158–3384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of released cultivars increased 2.4% per annum between 1989 and 2001.

Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.4% per annume0
Setting
Wallendbeene0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of yield increase in the cultivars released between 1989 and 2001 was 2.4% per annum as judged from small plot yields of all cultivars in each of 4 years at Wallendbeen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3386–3563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering-time adjustment provided a one-off improvement.

Outcome
one-off improvemente0
Qualifier
Flowering time adjustmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering time adjustment provided a one-off improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3565–3621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest field selection for pathogen, soil and climate tolerance and nutrient-use efficiency to sustain progress.

Outcome
field selection for traitse0
Qualifier
continued progress seems possiblee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“continued progress seems possible by field selection for traits such as increased resistance to the Sclerotinia and Alternaria pathogens, resistance to acid soils, waterlogging, frost at flowering, heat and drought during seed maturation, and increased efficiency of nutrient utilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3627–3914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–23 · show in text ↑